@FBM,
I agree, FBM. The time series you shared shows a cyclical pattern of "rapid" increasing trends followed by "relatively gradual" decreasing trends over 50-100,000 yr periods. The range in 400k years of displayed data for CO2 is b/w 180 and 300ppm. That's more than enough time to predict that we should have been entering another period of decreasing trends in CO2, but instead, experienced a sudden level increase.
The data for the last 150 years is so radically different from the previous 100's of thousands of years. To argue that the display does not have a complete enough range on the x-axis is simply red herring.
CO2 jumped up dramatically in the last 150 years. The evolution of man-made technologies post the industrial revolution being a primary variable responsible for the observed changes in CO2 seems a very reasonable explanation.