Origins of the Universe

I would say that the true origins and understanding of the sciences begins when you view the holes in the universe as just that.

HOLES.

Holes that contain the vibratory balanced + and - electromagnetic forces in nature which cannot be cancelled out.

The true scientific description of a hole is “Glassy” therefore and not black or white.

“Glassy” is a type of FULCRUM or fixed/still point.

Science is symmetrical.

Science needs to change its direction

Unsymmetrical science is not the way.

It’s quite shocking that scientists can’t even see what is happening right in front of them because they are so blinkered or blind.

Matter has exited and will enter the hole associated with its own galaxy only.So how is it that scientist claim that matter has exited and will enter a single hole?

What utter utter nonsense.

If you ask any scientist in the world what force hopefully caused (hope because they can’t prove it) the single Big Bang and the science behind it and they haven’t got a clue.

If you ask a scientist what is this force gravity that hopefully caused (hope because they can’t prove it) the single Big Crunch then they haven’t got a clue.

They will produce some mathematical calcs for sure to try and convince you that they have the proof for an unsymmetrical gravity force .However,Tesla who vetted these calcs and who Einstein claimed was the cleverest person in the world at the time completely dismissed them as mathematical garb.So even Einstein’s peer thought this unsymmetrical gravity force didn’t exist.

Tesla of course had his 2 equal but opposite forces that could explain everything symmetrically.

It's agonizing going through this bilge, but I did. There are several major flaws in this analysis:

1. The statement that scientists "haven't got a clue" about the force that caused the Big Bang is simply incorrect. While there are still many unanswered questions about the origins of the universe, scientists have put forth various theories about what could have caused the Big Bang, such as cosmic inflation or quantum fluctuations.

2. The statement that scientists "haven't got a clue" about the force of gravity is also incorrect. Gravity is one of the best understood forces in physics, and scientists have been able to make many accurate predictions about the behavior of gravity using mathematical models and experiments.

3. The claim that scientists have produced "mathematical calcs" to try and convince people of an unsymmetrical gravity force is not supported by any evidence. There is no widely accepted theory of gravity that involves an unsymmetrical force.

4. The idea that Tesla had his own theory of equal but opposite forces that could explain everything symmetrically is false. While Tesla made significant contributions to the field of electrical engineering, his ideas about physics were often unconventional and not widely accepted by the scientific community. Even Einstein, who admired Tesla's work, did not agree with all of his ideas and did not consider him to be the "cleverest person in the world" as claimed in the flawed analysis.

I have put it on these forums many times that as matter is disappearing into multiple holes (not black holes but “glassy” holes) right now all over the universe then how is it that scientists can claim ALL matter is going to disappear into just one single hole in the future?

Not a single challenge back ever.The question is still there.It ain’t going anywhere.It’s a question that scientists are unable to answer because it is a question that makes a total mockery of all the presently accepted theories in science.As matter is disappearing into multiple holes then this proves that the gravity theory is incorrect.

All matter associated with a particular galaxy disappears into its own “glassy” hole (the correct scientific term for a hole).The hole spins and continue to spin even when all the matter associated with that particular galaxy has disappeared.

The reason that the hole continues to spin is because it’s a magnet spinning within an electromagnetic field that hasn’t disappeared into the hole but remains in place.You can see where this is going.Picture the scene, if all matter disappeared you would still have holes spinning within electromagnetic fields.

The universe is saturated with electromagnetic fields.

The 2 equal but opposite electromagnetic forces in nature do not cancel out.They vibratory balance by the formula +/-=+/- which why holes “hum”

The biggest problem scientist have is that they are UNAWARE.

AWARENESS AWARENESS AWARENESS is massive in science, philosophy and psychology.

You cannot understand consciousness without it.

I disagree that that my posts are bilge Brandon9000.

My posts are deeply informative and explain in detail what is actually happening in science.

Now that you understand how all matter disappears we are now into TESLA territory.

TESLA was way way way ahead of Einstein scientifically,He just didn’t need to shout about it,

Thank God your posts are so deeply informative, too bad real scientists are giggling when they read them.

They are bound to giggle glitterbag.That is inevitable.

I’m giggling louder though.

Observations are not backing up the single BB theory at all.They are confirming a multiple BB theory.The electromagnetic fields that saturate the universe are completely independent of these multiple BB's. Matter IS disappearing into multiple holes (at various timescales) that continue to spin within these fields when the localized matter associated with that hole has disappeared..

Scientists can laugh all they like whilst they watch their own theories fail.

My philosophy; science and psychology is totally sound because I play by the rules.

Science is symmetrical, it is not unsymmetrical.You only get symmetrical science if the electromagnetic fields precede matter.Matter can come and go as it pleases but the electromagnetic fields which are separate,remain.

All matter is disappearing into multiple holes which are within the electromagnetic fields which saturate the universe,When all matter has gone, symmetrical science will remain.

What will be left is multiple SPINNING holes within electromagnetic fields and PRESENCE.

We know that modern day scientific theories are incorrect because it only takes one atom to disappear into one hole and another atom to disappear into another hole and the modern day sciences collapse.

Of course we know that atoms disappear into multiple holes rather than a single hole and observations have confirmed it…………well,,,,,..we know if we are AWARE but scientists aren’t AWARE are they.

You require AWARENESS to understand CONSCIOUSNESS.

As scientists ARE unaware, they don’t understand consciousness.As they don’t understand consciousness then they don’t understand science.

All sciences are interconnected.

What science is presently claiming and has claimed since it first started to try and reinvent science is that if you interact a + electromagnetic force with a - electromagnetic force OR a - electromagnetic force with a + electromagnetic force OR a - electromagnetic force with a - electromagnetic force OR a + electromagnetic force with a + electromagnetic force you will get no reaction at all which is an absurd claim.

These forces of nature need to be balanced if you want symmetrical science.

You can only balance these forces of nature if you interact a + and - force with a + and - force.

What science has GUESSED all along since it began its quest to try and reinvent science ,but has kept silent about, because it knows that it is a foundational guess is that the electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos did not precede THEIR invented single Big Bang but rather came after.

Of course these electromagnetic fields were around prior to any big bangs.

You don’t get symmetrical science otherwise.

Science is about to divide into two.

1.The scientist that prefers unsymmetrical science based upon unfounded scientific data.This science has nothing to do with real science at all but rather the scientists philosophical half logic possibility beliefs.

2.The scientists that prefers symmetrical science based upon founded scientific data.This science has everything to do with real science because it is based upon the scientists realistic full logic possibility beliefs.