relationship between GOD,MAN and NATURE

I don't believe in "invention" human or above human or whatever sort of creationism. For us, within time, all is discovery ! There is no creation in that which is eternal. Build a line which is not curved nor straight and you will convince me you have invented new geometry, go on...you see we edit stuff we invent nothing...

My concept of "GOD", was well explained before and has nothing to do with agency or mind. I have no part on the pathetic Judaic Christian mythology or any other similar bull. My "GOD" can be resumed in one single word: UNITY.
Reality is a timeless whole. Simple if you don't care to complicate it.
As for Frank he is stubborn like hell and repeats a lot of stuff all fair n true but don't think for a minute you are that different. You just have more techno babble to spit up. I like techno babble make no mistake...but when it comes to serious adults talk I know how to distinguish what is what...200 years of science have a lot to catch up with the best of 5000 years of Philosophy. (Please discount 90% of the idiots that dwell in philosophy, its a hard discipline, unlike science which any methodical dumb ass can do)

Welcome to A2K, Wiz.

Should you begin with the assertion that a God exists who created all things with a purpose, then the force by which he created those things and their attendant laws and qualities might best be described as nature.

If, man was indeed created according to his purpose, it would seem reasonable and I would hope that his purpose would be communicated to us in some form. That leaves us with a conundrum:

An all powerful God capable of harnessing all the energy and forces of the cosmos - why would he create a race of humans who have brutalized each other for eons? Why would he place within us the concept of indefinite time if we are but to live a few short years and die? If God is truly all powerful, reasonable, and, yes, fair, the reason for such disparity must also be communicated to us.

I submit that it has.

And when we get to the subject of the message God has provided for us, it would not be devised as in need of "deep metaphysical" interpretation so that we ordinary folks, the amharets, if you will, should depend on priests or pharisees or popes to direct us. On the contrary, scripture has been written for the least of us.

.Why would this message need interpretation at all? I would think this kind of a god would be able to communicate any message sans any and all ambiguity. . .

He didn't mention interpretation at all; you did.

You're assuming that a deep metaphysical, higher class theology communicated by this kind of a god would need interpreting by Priests, Pharisees and Popes.

Who said I was referring to the bible or popes ???
Yes your conception of God is childish, so what, I bet you've heard it before !

...people like to debate whether soccer makes more sense then football for coinage....rarely people opt to discuss about substance... yeah welcome to hats and gangs sort of debate...its 99.9% of web debating anyway...
Don't like it has I don't ? Avoid it it or put up... "tribalism" is rampant back there where you guys write from...its nerve wrecking for a pacific European like me...