@Leadfoot,
Quote: My guess is that 99+ % of those who condemn ID as "religion" have no indepth knowledge of cellular biology
Nor do 99% of those who preach that fallacy have a knowledge of statistics.
ID has NEVER BEGUN WITH EVIDENCE> IT HAS ALWAYS BEGUN WITH A PROPOSITION THAT "Life is too complex to have arisen without an intelligence behind it" The several courts have carefully reviewed the evidence that supports statement and its precursor (That being "SCIENTIFIC CREATIONISM") and have found it to be religiously based and therefore not science (in the sense that the science does not break the "Establishment Clause" rule of the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution). If you feel your arguments re more compelling than those that underlie the Majority opinions of the US SUPREME COURT (2 such rulings) and the region 4 and region 3 district courts similR "FINDINGS" tht underlie their rulings--then you should try to communicate them.
SO FAR, no evidence has ever been pesented to underpin CREATIONISM or its child, ID.
Your statement re the "Bonding" of The 5 nucleotides" are not done in non biological arenas" > I agree, That is a true statement, but do you undesrtnd how this is done (nd speculate on the why)??