1
   

Scott Peterson trial…circumstantial evidence?

 
 
Reply Sun 11 Jul, 2004 11:00 am
What are your thoughts about the prosecution being able to get a conviction based on circumstantial evidence?

For those interested, I found that Court TV's Nancy Grace is conducting a series of live interviews with some interesting people related to the case. Some people scheduled for the shows are Juror #5, FBI agents, detectives, etc. This airs Monday - Thursday (July 12th - 15th) at 11pm each night.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,166 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Jul, 2004 11:25 am
It's plainly obvious that Scott Peterson is guilty based on the circumstantial evidence but a good lawyer always throws in that "reasonabable doubt" thing.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Take it All - Discussion by McGentrix
Cancelled - Discussion by Brandon9000
John Stewart meets Bill O'Reilly - Discussion by Thomas
BEFORE WE HAD T.V. - Discussion by edgarblythe
What TV shows do you watch? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Orange is the New Black - Discussion by tsarstepan
Odd Premier: Under the Dome - Discussion by edgarblythe
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"? - Discussion by firefly
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Scott Peterson trial…circumstantial evidence?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 07:13:58