No thats incorrect. (You arent aware of the literature in this subject )e. There have been several reports re: chemicals preserved in other kinds of fossils in recent years. Even Dr Shweitzers T rex discovery was reported in the real scientific literature in 2005. Later , in 2007 had been other such dicoveries and then a whole batch of papers re: the "Mechanisms" of preservation (possible surface chem reactions and chelation of iron porphorins in dino blood ). There was even a report
regarding porphirins in mosquito fossils preserved in Eocen "amber". Yes, the blood of mosquito victims was preserved in amber just as Creighton theorized in "Jurassic Park"
erNothing beyond the iron porphyrins was preserved, no DNA or greater.
What e iweve got here is a new method of fossilization that involves prganic chemicals. Its not a basis to "believe" that all fossil dates are wrong.
The evidence on the Hell Creek Formation is very robust. The ash beds,(where all these theropod fossils were found), have been dated to 67 to 66 m.y. dates.
I realize your wacky worldview embraces Creationism, but the real evidence says youre full of crap.
Youve gotta get over this belief that "soft tissue" means "young"