kickycan wrote:I agree with your overall point craven, but I would still argue that it is a double standard. I'm just saying that this is an example where a double standard isn't a bad thing.
Fair enough. It's a double standard along the lines of:
"She gets to play with her boobs but I don't!!!!"
Quote:Maybe I'm just getting hung up on the definition of double standard. Isn't it a double standard when one person is (or would be) attacked or looked down on for saying something, and another person's words would be praised or at least accepted for saying the very same thing?
Not at all, unless you are not capable of recognizing contextual differences and differences of intent.
If I told you:
"I am going to kill you"
And a thief pointing a gun at you told you "I am going to kill you." you would probably react differently.
Not because of a "double standard" but because of an elementary ability to discern contextual difference.
Here, this is a glaringly obvious contextual difference.
Bill Cosby is saying this with an earnest desire to see uplifting.
IF a KKK member said it they might be trying to assert racial inferiority.
If you consider these two scenarios "the very same thing" then the problem is with your inability to discern the difference and not a "double standard".
Again, a sex example because I think this would help.
If you say to your wife: "I'm gonna screw you" and I say to your wife "I'm gonna screw you" is it "the very same thing"? Would you consider it a "double standard" if you were unable to treat both instances exactly the same?
No, it's recognition that words are representative and that the simplistic notion of taking words on face value and ignoring context makes no sense.