contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:46 am
Yes. The Aérospatiale company placed an ad in a business magazine which although edited in London, has an international reach, to say that Exocets were good missiles, and I expect their PR department probably groaned when this happened. I also expect that most British companies would (at least) think of doing a similar thing if they were in that situation and had shareholders baying for action.


Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 10:52 pm
@contrex,
If this is an arse kissing contest for the French, then you win . Your logic and eloquence ...how did you put it ...
Quote:
Why don't you **** off, Ionus,
is rather hard to dispute with facts and references . You will be pleased to know, if I can write this in a manner you will understand given your obvious limits, that all this is because Orifice5fingers can not admit that the French Government and French Industry are not guilty of corruption . Apparently, because they are French and so is he, they are God like .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 10:54 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
So you have an article (barely readible) about an ad
Yeah, sorry it is in a foreign language to you, but maybe you can get it translated ?

Quote:
Maybe the article you posted is just lying or misrepresenting the case.
Maybe you are so psychotically arrogant you cant admit an error ? Has anyone ever heard of arrogance from the French ?
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 10:56 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
A country which knows no evil, for sure...
Is that an attempt to redirect ? I would be happy to discuss my countries problems, it seems only fair...but can we at first establish that you called me a liar when I was telling the truth ?
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:02 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Indeed, although British in history and culture, and headquartered in London. The relevant point being that its audience is international, and that its advertisements are not typically targeted at the average UK consumer.
There you go then, it was an honest attempt to tell the world that the Exocet is a lovely missile and did indeed kill many British seamen and any attempt to say it didnt work is lies . Ahh... the sensitivity of the collective French....
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:03 pm
@contrex,
Quote:
The point I made at 8.20 AM today (above)
Yes, contrex, no one is stealing your glory...La Gloire !!
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:24 pm
@contrex,
Quote:
Yes. The Aérospatiale company placed an ad in a business magazine which although edited in London, has an international reach, to say that Exocets were good missiles, and I expect their PR department probably groaned when this happened. I also expect that most British companies would (at least) think of doing a similar thing if they were in that situation and had shareholders baying for action.
I agree . I am not here to knock the French . I am here because I was called a liar . I am demonstrating that I am not . I want an apology .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:26 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Ionus wrote:
Quote:
Are you a French lawyer to boldly state that the incident DIDN'T take place or are you just trolling ? I'm telling you he was charged by the Police and was waiting for his trial when he would have to prove he was not guilty of assaulting 4 French men outside a pub that he walked past . The Australian Embassy was involved and they had statements from them as well . If I could find the article I would rub your nose in it .
No article so far. It's innocent until proven guilty in France since 1789.
The man was charged by Police and it was to be heard by a Police tribunal . That is a conflict of interest and would not be any where good enough in most democratic countries .
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:28 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
contrex wrote:
Quote:
The point I made at 8.20 AM today (above)
And you wrote as well that it isn't a newspaper.
Walt, you are making a fool of yourself..or are you joking ?
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:32 pm
Quote:
The Exocet that struck the Sheffield impacted on the starboard side at deck level 2, travelling through the junior ratings scullery and breaching the Forward Auxiliary Machinery Room/Forward Engine Room bulkhead 2.4 metres (7 ft 10 in) above the waterline, creating a hole in the hull roughly 1.2 by 3 metres (3.9 by 9.8 ft). It appears that the warhead did not explode.[14] Accounts suggest that the initial impact of the missile disabled the ship's electrical distribution systems and breached the pressurised sea water fire main, severely hampering any firefighting response and eventually dooming the ship to be consumed by the fire. The loss of Sheffield was a deep shock to the British public and government.

Some of the crew of Sheffield were of the opinion that the missile exploded, others held the view that it had not. The official Royal Navy Board of Inquiry Report, however, stated that evidence indicates that the warhead did not detonate. During the four and a half days that the ship remained afloat, five salvage inspections were made and a number of photographs were taken. Members of the crew were interviewed, and testimony was given by Exocet specialists (the Royal Navy had 15 surface combat ships armed with Exocets in the Falklands War). There was no evidence of an explosion, although burning propellant from the rocket motor had caused a number of fires, which could not be checked as a fire main had been put out of action.

The Atlantic Conveyor was a container ship that had been hastily converted to an aircraft transport and was carrying helicopters and supplies. The missiles had been fired at a frigate but had been confused by the frigate's defences and instead targeted the Atlantic Conveyor nearby. The Exocets - it is not certain whether the warheads exploded or not - caused a fire in the fuel and ammunition aboard which burnt the ship out. Atlantic Conveyor sank while under tow three days later.


Because there may be some doubt about the efficiency of the missile in some peoples minds, the charming French took out an ad, basically full of boasting and lies, what we have come to expect .
This is a newspaper article on the Ad .
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19840913&id=86xjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iuEDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2678,2991396&hl=en

As for corrupt french men...C'est impossible....
http://www.newsweek.com/code-breakers-114221
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:32 pm
@Ionus,
Neither.
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:35 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Neither.
Still pissed at me because I insisted you didnt understand the nuances of a particular English expression, hey Walt ? That was years ago and I have tried to smooth things over, but you are a petty little narrow minded man .
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Apr, 2015 11:42 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
The man was charged by Police and it was to be heard by a Police tribunal . That is a conflict of interest and would not be any where good enough in most democratic countries .
Exactly why?

Oh, I see: "police tribunal".
That's in French "Tribunal de police", one judge and a court clerk.
http://i59.tinypic.com/2dqipw0.jpg
(That would be a local court/magistrates court, an Amtsgericht in Germany.)
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 05:29 am
@Ionus,
You made an error, not me. You said:

Quote:
During the Falklands War the French Company that makes the Exocet Missile published a full page ad in British newspapers saying its missiles were working and killing lots of British sailors


That is factually false. The Economist is a magazine, its ads are not primarily targeted at British people. And so far we don't even know what the ad said... You're phony.

Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 05:34 am
@Ionus,
You ARE a liar and you are still lying. Now we also know you are a coward.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 05:37 am
@Ionus,
Quote:
There you go then, it was an honest attempt to tell the world that the Exocet is a lovely missile and did indeed kill many British seamen and any attempt to say it didnt work is lies . Ahh... the sensitivity of the collective French....

If that mysterious ad of yours says something about the Frenchmen who conceived it, what does it says about the British guys who printed it?
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 06:44 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
At the bottom of the court hierarchy are the courts of minor jurisdiction.[4] The Police Court (tribunal de police, also called the Police Tribunal) hears contraventions, minor criminal offenses such as traffic violations, minor assaults, and breaches of the peace.
From your reference if I am correct, (you didn't accredit it ) .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_France

Can the judge in a Police Tribunal be a serving or ex-serving Police Officer if he is a postgraduate from the School of Magistrature ?

At the head of the Courts is the Ministry for Justice, ruled by a politician .
https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_ordinary_courts-18-fr-en.do?member=1
Quote:
6. Ongoing reforms
In 2008, President Sarkozy announced plans to further reform and streamline the French judiciary. Among the reforms are plans to reduce the number of courts, move court procedures towards a more adversarial system, and to get rid of the system of avoués in the courts of appeal. This change has not yet been implemented.
One reform recently tried out in a couple of Tribunaux correctionnels (criminal courts) was the introduction of trial by jury, previously limited to the assize courts. Juries in this case were made up of six members of the public, and three magistrates. But in 2013, the socialist administration of François Hollande decided to scrap this reform, claiming the process was expensive, slowed down the judicial procedure, and did not produce any significant change in results.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 06:57 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
That is factually false. The Economist is a magazine, its ads are not primarily targeted at British people. And so far we don't even know what the ad said...
Laughing During the Falklands War the French Company that makes the Exocet Missile published a full page ad in a magazine that had circulation in Britian saying its missiles were working and killing lots of British sailors..
Are we happy now mon ami ? Very Happy
Because the French lied through their teeth . They had far more ships hit, just under 50% more than in reality, and the ad specifically said it was in response to claims that the exocet which killed British sailors and sank the HMS Sheffield failed to explode . Charming people at Aerospatiale which also is a major share holder of the Airbus, a crash of which instigated you calling me a liar .

You have a newspaper account of the ad..you originally didnt believe me when I said it was much publicised here . Stick your head back in the sand, then you wont have to lie and look stupid all in the same breath .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 07:04 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
You ARE a liar and you are still lying.
Your stupidity got you into this, and now you are trying to bluff your way out by being nasty ? I invented nasty, you dirty little piece of merde .

Quote:
Now we also know you are a coward
You mean like the French ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Army_Mutinies
Quote:
The French Army Mutinies of 1917 took place amongst the French troops on the Western Front in Northern France. They started just after the disastrous Second Battle of the Aisne, the main action in the Nivelle Offensive in April 1917. General Robert Nivelle had promised a decisive war-ending victory over the Germans in 48 hours; the men were euphoric on entering the battle. The shock of failure soured their mood overnight. They involved, to various degrees, nearly half of the French infantry divisions stationed on the western front. The new commander General Philippe Pétain restored morale by talking to the men, promising no more suicidal attacks, providing rest for exhausted units, home furloughs, and moderate discipline. He held 3400 courts martial; 554 mutineers were sentenced to death but over 90% had their sentences commuted. The mutinies were kept secret from the Germans and their full extent was not revealed until decades later. Gilbert and Bernard find multiple causes:

The immediate cause was the extreme optimism and subsequent disappointment at the Nivelle offensive in the spring of 1917. Other causes were pacificism, stimulated by the Russian Revolution and the trade-union movement, and disappointment at the nonarrival of American troops
...
the support of Prime Minister Clemenceau, who told President Woodrow Wilson in June 1917 that France planned, "to wait for the Americans & meanwhile not lose more ... I like Pétain ... just because he won't attack'."
How many British lives did these COWARDS cause the British and the USA ? Of course they wanted to go home and drink wine and eat cheese...British and USA lives were just trash to be thrown out, right ?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Apr, 2015 07:06 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Can the judge in a Police Tribunal be a serving or ex-serving Police Officer if he is a postgraduate from the School of Magistrature ?
Judges in France, like elsewhere, have to study law. Might well be that a police officer or ex-officer does so after he's retired. Then, they have to go to the École nationale de la magistrature (ENM).
I'm not quite sure, but since French judges are fonctionnaires, there's certainly an age limit for entrance in the l'ordre judiciaire.

A serving policeman is impossible, since it would mean, such a person has two full time jobs as a civil servant.
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 06:31:03