@neologist,
Quote:If a neologist writes a word, but nobody reads it, did he ever say anything?
Glennn: You were trying to minimize the crime that was committed by Moses and his hordes.
Neologist: Or, you have inflated it to fit your premise.
Glennn: No. Surely you have read the account of what Moses and his hordes did. It was inhumane, barbaric, etc. This is what I mean about you trying to minimize what happened.
Neologist: Could it be because they were not innocent?
Glennn: Sure, you tell yourself whatever you need to believe about the children in order to not have to address their murder. Also, you're being dishonest concerning the reason why Moses and his hordes attacked the Midianites. Go get your deified book and refresh your memory.
Neologist: Emotionally charged words reveal your bias.
Glennn: So, now, not only is the god's order to kill every man, woman, and child (except for the young females) an acceptable consequence for causing some Israelite men to worship another god, but anyone pointing it out to you will be guilty of an emotionally charged outburst, thereby revealing a bias which you can then use as a reason to not admit to the reality of the atrocities committed by Moses and the god that told him to do it. You do understand that the god told Moses to do it, don't you?
And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire.
You said that the whore was killed before being burned. I asked you for a reference to support that statement.
Neologist: If a neologist writes a word, but nobody reads it, did he ever say anything?
_________________________________
So, the real question here is: If Neologist refuses to provide reference for a claim he has made, did he ever say anything? Also, if Neologist refuses to admit that his claim that the children of the Midianites were guilty and therefore deserving of being slaughtered and raped by Moses and his hordes, does he even understand what he has written? The answer in both cases is
no.