But you have no evidence.
Because in my case we are talking about sexual abuse recovery, which the feminists dont want science to get into. Because about the first place that goes is the fact that a huge portion of those who are sexually abused never reach the high trama states that the feminists insist that all do. As you almost certainly know.
How many times are you going to amend your story?
First you state as a fact "those who heal from trauma best almost always heal with a strong spiritual element, and religion supplies this."
Then you turn around and say it's purely based on your personal, ergo limited experience "Personal experience of living with traumatized people, working with traumatized people, and conversing with others who help traumatized people."
Next you change your tune to "spiritual life does not need to be supplied by religion" when you alread said "religion supplies this."
Then we go on to you telling us that "I know a lot more than almost everyone else."
Finally, you go grasping at straws, bringing whatever definition of feminism you personally have into it, and claiming all this time you've been talking about a particular type of trauma, again with no evidence religion has anything to do with recovery from it.
Talk about being a bullshit artist. You can't even keep on the same subject.
Since you allude that you are involved in religion, I think that sums up perfectly how little good religion has to offer the world today.
Oh, yeah, the religion of sexual bondage and S&M