Proof that the speed of light is a universal maximum, is impossible

Good for you.

Have a lovely day

does he preach about indices of refraction and the speed of light?
Wonder where in Kabbalistic BS is that written.??

Justafool.

I get you.

You are mistaken - And wise in your own eyes.

Zionists Hide behind the 'semitic' 'card'.
From Medici, Borgia, Hapsburger (18th cent inbred southern fried 'Jawlines')





Do Not mistake 'Genius'.

Mark...

What reason do you offer to explain why you are "the enlightened one" "possessor of the hidden truths", whereas everyone else is deluded?

Kabbal is mystical beliefs based around the magic of numerology.
Its intrinsic in the cult of Judaism. (consider the mystical religious use of the number 6 million, used as if it was a real number when it's really a made up figure. 300 thousand jews died, they claim its 6 million.) Everything about jews is 6 million. When Hitler was just a boy, the jews were complaining about 6 million poor jews were being killed, and they wanted MONEY.

Einstein was a Zionist jew, he was a maths and numbers nerd, go figure.

the speed of light has very little to do with your belief system. Its variable according to the index oof refraction of the clear medium through which it passes.

Your dwelling upon the kaballah is a waste of our time.

The speed of sun light in the earths atmoshere did change in the Silurian through the Permian because the earths atmosphere was actually denser and its IR was about 1.89, in the Hadean it was even a bit denser

Anything else, especially regarding religious opinions in physics, Please find someone who actually cares.

Religious ideas are DRIVING your science, so you would be amiss not to take heed.

And Light speed is VARIABLE not only because of refractive index, its variable in a vacuum too.
According to Einstein.

we define the sppeed of light in a vacuum because we assign its IR as 1. Itd be net to find something with an IR lower than 1 bcause then time travel wouldnt be a difficult thing.

As far as religion being the drivers of science, we apparently agree to disagree.

gnight

I did not mention the RI of a vacuum. I said that light speed in that vacuum is NOT A CONSTANT, according to Einstein.
And, even if you found a medium that had a lower RI than 1, then that would not mean anything with regard to "Time Travel".
Travelling in Time, (a nonsense idea,) is not linked to Light speed, or the imaginary new idea of the "speed of information".

I thought you wanted to talk about science, not sci-fi.

if Distance = Time X rate of speed (D=t r)

then just by simple rearranging t=D/r.

Wonderful. But what has that to do with anything?
Nothing to do with time travel, or the speed of light not being a constant.

really. Think tsd more relativistically, perhaps youll get an "OHMIGOD I NEVER THOUGHTA THAT!!!"

A valiant effort. You will have no luck though.

Look, if you are only going to make sideways remarks and hint that there is some connection to Time Dilation and the non constancy of Light, then I'm not prepared to guess what on Earth you are talking about.
A valiant effort? That's crap. No real effort is what you dish up.

Relativistically, (ACTUAL GENUINE relativistically, Time, Distance and Velocity remain the same exactly like we observer in the real world.
Velocities are additive, Time remains stable, and of course a meter is still a meter regardless of speed. This is the only trruth.

But if you prefer to "see" things in the same vein as others view Santa, the tooth fairy and Peter Pan, then go for it. I'm only interested in Physics.

I've noticed you 'excel' at putting words into others' mouths.

Add 1 drop of water to the ocean (Any) - And 'INSTANTLY' All the connected waterways Rise, in accord. Now That's Fast! 64xC (Light speed) to be exact.

Have a lovely day

No such thing as a vacuum.

Have a lovely day

no, youre just spouting science fiction bumper stickers an replay what relitivistically means.

But that is exactly what you are doing with Einstein's so called physics. Its all rhetoric based on fantasy and impossible situations.
One big Paradox from start to finish.
And you refuse point blank to discuss it, because you know you have no rational arguments to offer.
Talking with a Relativist is like trying to discus religion with a Mormon, or getting a Jew to prove that there really were 6 million.

You cant ignore the cult influence in this world, and Science is a prime target for the cult.
See this truth, and then you can take of the blinds and understand or maybe just start to be really critical, instead of mindless acceptance of authority.

That's why Nassim backtracked Einsteinium physics to a point before he became 'managed' - He is self-taught and Non-Academically inlined (Or limited/restricted.

You cannot debate mainstream physics with mainstream physics.
Have a lovely day

yeah man here is light speed experiment 2.0> put a mass in the path of light and watch it slow down as it arcs around it, or yes we could measure light speed in numerous places as we have not done ,