@nononono,
nononono wrote:
You inferred that men are not raped.
This is an example of your monumental stupidity. Leaving aside the fact that in no way did Setanta suggest men weren't raped, the word you're looking for is implied. Implying something is active; were I to refer to your
porcine prose then I would be implying you've probably got a lot of pig DNA in your genetic makeup. If (after looking up all the long words,) you came to the same conclusion then you would be inferring that I think you're some sort pig/chav hybrid.
So
you inferred that Setanta suggested men were not raped, (even though he didn't.) Setanta didn't infer anything, or if he did he kept shtum.
Most people know the difference by the time they're 13.