@Quehoniaomath,
Differences in DNA between species shows diversification, it is actually necessary to be there for evolution to have any merit. How on Earth you think that disproves evolution is sadly laughable.
You may also want to learn about genetics and what a paternity test is as it is exactly how we can tell you that you are without a doubt a primate. You are anatomically, physiologically, homologically, and genetically a primate mammal.
Furthermore, you are a eukaryote organism genetically, and you are genetically linked to single celled eukaryotic cells. And if you had any education of how genetics are passed on, you would realize how inept your arguments are.
Lastly, I only need reference vegetables to entirely destroy your argument.., and as directly observed evolution from mustard plants. Or if you like, we can play a game of morphology as the morphological changes from the skull of a wolf to that of a bull dog is no grander in scale than the changes we see between and modern homo-sapiens :
We are more genetically diverse from our ancestors than dogs are from wolves, and not by much. However, we had millions of years vs thousands.. And genetic variation isn't an indication of morphology as is gene expression. Hence missing links you feel we need are not required since they are unlikely to exist. This again is because gene expression..., this to which wolf to bull dog can easily demonstrate as you cannot find or demonstrate a seamless and smooth transition of links between them. And even a small change in Phenotype can have a massive impact on morphology at the macro scale without providing transitions between one state or the other. Even vegetables from mustard plants demonstrate this very point.
Essentially creationists are intellectually bankrupt and rely on uneducated tripe from other uneducated idiots like Ken ham..
