Why do people associate evolution with where life came from

If you can't present any facts, then do not disagree with people who do not accept your theory. Bye the way some synonyms to theory are, assumption, doctrine, ideology, philosophy, scheme, speculation, suspicion, conjecture, guesswork, hunch, presumption, shot, supposal, surmise, and supposition.

Now when you say that you have a theory that hard drives and computer like code formed in a pond, and I say that I have a theory that hard drives and computer like codes can not form in a pond. Which makes scientific sense?

Does it make scientific sense to say that if humanity can get basic life forms to take hold on another planet, that humanity would have acted in a manner that has been attributed to what God is said to have done here in the past? And that if these forms of life evolve, that they could one day ask, from where did we come, thus evolutionary theory is proved, by humans who acted as God.

Science is behind me

Your point of view, is that life spawned from nothing and nowhere, this does not even constitute a point of view, in fact it is closer to not having a point of view.

You then say that after many years of random gibberish, that more random gibberish was the gibberish. Dude, a third grader could make the suppositions of evolution, and it takes no brains to say that "it just happened Daddy"

Well it just happened Daddy is not science, in fact the theory of evolution hinges of pure faith, and when examined closely, it will be condemned by science as heresy, or just plain nonsense, the lack of a better idea, does not make another idea more correct.

Seriously, a creationist could easily say, that God spawned from a warm pond, and then created life, would you accept this????????

Science is behind me, and the idea that both codes and hardware to hold those codes are the products of very high intelligence, from somewhere. See if you can disprove this concept by science.

Does this look random?


Does this look random?

Science, and Louis Pasteur disproved abiogenesis and spontaneous generation a long time ago. This is taught in all textbooks, except in those that also teach that abiogenesis is the source of all life.
Now that is circular, and comical indeed.

Now you are not only saying that life could come from lifelessness, but you are also claiming that a rat could give birth to a primate, which is exactly what evolutionary theory calls for. Oh of course, you will claim that over millions of years, that rats evolved into a humans. Well if this is true, why are there still rats, if rats evolved into humans.
Evolution relies on circular logic, created from a complete lack of thought.

As for high intelligence, if life is moved to Mars or Europa, yes I believe that this will be the product of very high intelligence, as low intelligence people do not build spacecraft, nor do genetic science. There is thus no reason that high intelligence did not influence this planet, and this theory is seriously more plausible than "it just happened one day in a pond Daddy"

Brandon, can you grasp, that no matter how particular you are in your arguments, that there is still no evidence that either life formed in a pond, nor is this theory supported by scientific logic.

The following have to be in an exact order in the billions, for a life form to grow, one mistake and the effect could be fatal, mathematically, the randomness of this is an impossibility.

There is no understanding of where life that evolves came from, just your theory, that, "it just happened one day in a pond Daddy"

Actually the randomness of evolutionary mutations is being challenged, as they may well be a programmed part of the evolutionary process that is encoded into the DNA code, we may call them random only because the code is still too complex for us to decode fully. Junk DNA is also being challenged, as it was only named junk DNA because the discoverer of the parts did not know what they were used for, thus junk DNA might be the library from where seemingly random mutations come from, or it may be the leftovers of past evolution, which might mean that every life form that is extinct could be rebuilt form the parts here, or new ones formed, if an intelligent life form does gene splicing or some as of now undiscovered process of new life formation.

The person who is sure, is a BS artist.

You have proof that evolution is caused by accidents? The fact is that we view random mutations as random, because the method for how they happen can not be fully understood, an accident seems probable, but without understanding all of the billions of lines of DNA code in an organism, declaring any change as being an accident, is just not logical, and if the accident results in a better organism, this could easily be part of an intelligent chemical computer program. Again DNA among other things is a storage media for the code of life, and if chosen, Superman Comics too.