Evolution: A Crumbling Theory

@gungasnake,

gungasnake wrote:

The theory of evoloserism isn't difficult to state. The claim is that some dirt and rocks somehow or other got lucky and turned into one-celled organisms and that, thereafter, during some suitably gigantic space of time and via the agencies of mutation and natural selection, those one-celled organisms gave rise to all of the complex animals and plants which we observe today.

If that sounds stupid, it's because it IS stupid. The theory is no longer being supported by anybody with brains or talent; it draws its support from what most would term academic dead wood.

This is a misstatement of the theory. A minimum requirement for informed debate is the ability to state your opponent's position correctly. You shouldn't be debating the theory of evolution, because you don't know what it is. Would you care to try again?

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

Quote:

This is a misstatement of the theory. A minimum requirement for informed debate is the ability to state your opponent's position correctly. You shouldn't be debating the theory of evolution, because you don't know what it is. Would you care to try again?

Really? Let's here it from you!

That way we can be very very sure. Wink

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

Quote:

thereafter, during some suitably gigantic space of time and via the agencies of mutation and natural selection, those one-celled organisms gave rise to all of the complex animals and plants which we observe today.

That pretty much sums it up. DO YOU KNOW, that's the only conclusion we can make because we don't see any fossils of CAMBRIAN BUNNY RABBITS or DEVONIAN DUCKS do we?
All we see in the fossil record is a slow progression of life in complexity and variety. Pretty neat, you got something you can prove Otherwise???

BTW, someone once sked Haldane what it would take to find error in the theory of evolution, "Pre Cambrian Elephants" was what he said.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

That pretty much sums it up. DO YOU KNOW, that's the only conclusion we can make because we don't see any fossils of CAMBRIAN BUNNY RABBITS or DEVONIAN DUCKS do we?
All we see in the fossil record is a slow progression of life in complexity and variety. Pretty neat, you got something you can prove Otherwise???

BTW, someone once sked Haldane what it would take to find error in the theory of evolution, "Pre Cambrian Elephants" was what he said.

Do you have any idea what logic is?

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

do you know wht evisence is?? I kinda doubt it.

Why don't we see Devonian elephant, ? were they hiding so they wouldn't b caught nd fossilized?

In this case Absence of evidence IS evidence of absence.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

In this case Absence of evidence IS evidence of absence

Really????

lol

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

got anything intelligent to say?

guess not.

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Have you noticed that farmerman and brandon here do not appear to be on the same sheet of music wrt whether or not I know what evolution is?

3 Replies

@gungasnake,

Brndon is just asking. After reading almost 10 years of your junk Im certain that you don't know what evolution is . You just post crap from Creationist sites and hope it sticks.

Quahog believes that he is on a "bigger mission" dispensing idiot information. Hes a hoot n half

Whatever floats your boats dudes. Everyone needs a hobby.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

PS gunga, Ive asked for information of any colleges or Universities that offer :SCIENCE DEGREES" in "Creqtion SCience or ID".
You guy are surprisingly quiet on providing a response.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Most Evngelical SCientists have made their "peace with Darwin" years go and teach their students the theory of evolution as a fact of biology.
Maybe this lets out the Bob Jones U's who are only "specially accredited" in the biological sciences. They have what is called a "TARC" ccredittion but Im not even sure what that means since all schools strive for Regional Accreditation

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Heres a cute report that wants us to believe that, from the few examples the author presents a(bout 10 almost all Paleozoic) fossils that have , perhaps< had their ranges extended in an assemblage, we should "make believe" that a magic "Flood" discombobulated all the animals n arranged them according to their hydraulic mass, and stuff like Mmmals and birds and modern fishes were all "magically floated" to the top .
The arguments are not only lame, they are really bad science

https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/fossil-record/the-fossil-record/

0 Replies

@gungasnake,

Quote:

Have you noticed that farmerman and brandon here do not appear to be on the same sheet of music wrt whether or not I know what evolution is?

Nope. those girlies are on my ignore list. Wink

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

OOOOOOH, imagine . Quahog has an ignore list.
That mans hes just afraid to engage with truth.

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

why did I make it worse???

You perpetuated his error by failing to recognize it and by failing to demonstrate an understanding of the subject matter.

Evolution has already been proven beyond all reasonable doubt, so you will continue to lose by default until you can demonstrate a reasonable understanding of the subject, which you have not.

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

gungasnake wrote:

Have you noticed that farmerman and brandon here do not appear to be on the same sheet of music wrt whether or not I know what evolution is?

Your statement of the theory was incorrect. Do you want to try again or not? I am not going to let you distract me. Can you state it correctly or not? If you don't know what the theory is, then you have no place saying it's wrong.

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

You're full of ****, my statement of the theory was perfectly correct and adequate.

2 Replies

@gungasnake,

gungasnake wrote:

You're full of ****, my statement of the theory was perfectly correct and adequate.

gungasnake wrote:

The theory of evoloserism isn't difficult to state. The claim is that some dirt and rocks somehow or other got lucky and turned into one-celled organisms and that, thereafter, during some suitably gigantic space of time and via the agencies of mutation and natural selection, those one-celled organisms gave rise to all of the complex animals and plants which we observe today.

If that sounds stupid, it's because it IS stupid. The theory is no longer being supported by anybody with brains or talent; it draws its support from what most would term academic dead wood.

Dirts and rocks didn't get lucky. The origin of life is believed to have occurred in the world's oceans. Random recombinations of chemicals in the oceans eventually led to a molecule which made copies of itself. Among these self-replicating molecules, occasionally an error (mutation) would occur by chance. Most of the errors interfered with the successful propagation of the molecule containing the error, but occasionally an error would make the molecule more successful in creating descendants. Other errors resulted in dysfunctional traits which tended to die out. Over billions of years of reproduction, as more and more improvements were introduced, eventually cells resulted, and then multi-cellular organisms, which continued to improve over time. All of the animals (including humans) which exist today were produced by this process. Indeed, humans and trees (for example) have similar DNA.

0 Replies

@rosborne979,

Quote:

You perpetuated his error by failing to recognize it and by failing to demonstrate an understanding of the subject matter.

Evolution has already been proven beyond all reasonable doubt, so you will continue to lose by default until you can demonstrate a reasonable understanding of the subject, which you have not.

wow!! beyond all reasonable doubt ????????????????????????????
They don't even say that about other 'scientific subjects'!
Looks even more like a religion now!

But what you are actually saying is that, you, believe, that it is proven ' beyond all reasonable doubt"!

That doesn't make it true!

Lots, and lots of problems with this evolution theory.

Actually, I think , they first have to figure out how life came in existing anyway, but they are afraid to touch that because they can't handle that.
So now, the evolutionists reason it away.

Might take a while but eventully the will reason evolution itself away!

There is no other way.

0 Replies

@gungasnake,

Quote:

my statement of the theory was perfectly correct

Bullhit, you jut refusw to learn anything. SO, arguing with folks who make sense and call it something else is another sign of pathological denialism.

1 Reply

Evolution: A Crumbling Theory

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know