Farce

cool

as long as you understand than men are nothing more than sex toys

Yawn..this is like a female wearing a t-shirt that reads "classy lady" and criticizing she's not classy.....actually , you're statement is of a person who is extremely shallow. Do you think Beyoncé exemplifies all women? Ignorant, silly, shallow and most importantly sad...

Your concentration on "Women's Studies" misses the big picture.

1. Women graduate college at higher rates than men.
2. Women own one-third of all wealth in the US; given their late start, that's quite an accomplishment.
3. Women have been winning increasingly in politics.
4. Women have become CEO's of some of the biggest companies in the US.

What have "you" accomplished other than to denigrate women?

He can rotate his head whilst making a buzzy noise.

Imagine his/her success as a mate! ....or a father/mother.

I meant the poster not Beyoncé .

--The One Line Quipper--: These jamoke's-in-training (JIT's) reply with one-liner comments. They argue a point with the smallest amount of words possible. Simple, concise, and beautiful, at least, that's the goal. They represent an unforced combination of the Dali Lama and a professional comedian. Although, this strategy may fail if put into the hands of an idiot, which may happen 99% of the time.


Hi ehBeth, thanks for replying!

Wait, you must be joking.....men as sex toys. How do I get to this strange world? Hold on just a sec.....is this like that weird Islam virgins upon death deal?

Ahhh who cares, it sounds like a utopia...please sign me up.

Errr, wait a sec. Who am I kidding? Unfortunately sexual selection, the way we've evolved, and the whole basis for our existence is playing with a different deck of cards. It would be nice, but no, nature didn't play out this way.

--The Tired Genius--: This internet forum entity is simply too tired to exercise their brain. Without a doubt, they've heard it all before, but strangely, their brain is so tired that they often struggle to make a reasonable argument.

Germlat, thanks for the reply!

The majority of your responses are a personal attack. This was expected (that's fine, I'll just ignore it as it does nothing for either of us, and honestly, this approach can't possibly help you in the long run), but don't you agree that anyone with a small amount of intelligence will see the fallacy in your argument?

Your first sentence is actually quite revealing, and it gives me faith that we can continue this argument. I'm actually a bit surprised that you brought it up...its almost like it was planned. Although, now is not the time to extend in that direction (judging by the responses, that time may never come).

I'd like to metion that I see you as the most intelligent one here, that part is clear. Alas, there are plenty of ignorant folk here as well, and this dance starts with them. Since I hope to see you again, I'll give you a heads up. Look at the chromosomes that differentiate the male and female sex, xx and xy. One of those combinations supports many variations, and the other, not so much. Amusingly, your argument supports mine, but like I said. This is not the time for those details.

Secondly, you addressed my interpretation of Beyonce.

Does she represent all women?
Of course not!

Does she represent modern feminism?
Of course, yep, clearly, affirmative, without a doubt.

Using mans (type::burly) logic, she must also represent the foundation that feminism was built upon, AKA: Womens Studies. If you read my initial post, carefully, you should realize my argument is targeting a bigger point. Beyonce is an example of an idea, she's a poster child for the illegitimate subject we've come to know as (modern) Women's Studies.

Well...all your idiocy can be succinctly wrapped up with a one liner response ..not my fault.

--The Left Field Shooter--: This individual often appears on message boards threads with a list of irrelevant statistics. However confused they may appear, one must be careful, as they often show up, unexpectedly, spouting nonsense that innocent bystander brains may soak up.

Hey cicerone imposter!

I think you're a bit confused about the issue, and I'm pretty sure that I've got the Mona Lisa hanging on my breath, and you've got a little 3” x 3” photo on yours. These four random statistics are somewhat interesting....I guess? Although, they really don't serve a purpose to the argument, that's for sure. What was your plan here? How did you want me to reply? Perhaps you think I'm against women, and you were going to set me straight with some random info?

Anyway, thanks for the statistics. It's the poor man's mathematics that social science relies on. Honestly I don't know what else to say..... I guess...have a good day?

However way you wish to perceive it. Have a nice day!

I'm wondering by what other name we know this poster. He is obviously no newby despite the fact that his profile says he only signed up 10/14/14. That the o.p. was a put-on should have been obvious from the first.

Who ever this guy is, he's blind as a bat; he can't see how men embarrass themselves all the time. He even thinks women are men's sex toys. I don't think his momma ever taught him about the birds and the bees.

Other than nononono, no one else spouts this crap, or starts this kind of thread. He keeps grinding this same idiotic personal axe over and over.

He must have an endless supply of sock puppets, but they all sound alike. We've just met another one. .

As for Beyoncé, she can afford to laugh off fools like that and call herself anything she wants to:

I'm telling you, Tak -- don't take this clown seriously. We have no idea what he really thinks or believes. This is his only thread so far and he's testing the waters re: how far he can go and how many people will jump to the bait, i.e. feed the troll.

I don't take these jokers seriously. I just challenge their ignorance to make sure others see them for who they are.

Under this user name.

Given enough time, people show their characteristics.

He sounds a bit like Romeo Fabulini but I'm far from sure about that.