benMak
 
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 12:12 pm
Woman are nothing more than sex toys, inspiration, and a holder for man's children. Sadly, feminists continue to embarrass themselves in mass media, do primarily to a lack of logical reasoning. It's this lack of logical reasoning, along with male detain, that lead to the proliferation of Womens Studies across the U.S.. educational system (it's like ISIS...a bunch of idiots grouped together fighting an idiotic cause). Women's Studies is arguably not a science (it's even a sad excuse for a discipline, but it's certainly not a science). It is, however, another poor attempt at “social science” that attempts to brainwash people with low IQ's.

Look at Beyonce, she's a feminist.........right? She certainly proclaims to be, so I'll take her word.......correct? However, what has she done for women's rights? All that I know of her, as well as your average human, is that she goes up on stage and bounces her ass like she's riding a man's cock while singing an average, but well rehearsed, melody. As a guy this pleases me greatly, as she's just another uneducated slut obeying man. Basically, she's a porn star with a small bit of talent! This is what girls do though...this is what they where born to do, it's nature (you can argue with Darwin after you're dead).

I'm all for man and women equivalence, but if all you can muster up is Womens' Studies, Beyonce and a few poorly written scientific studies, than I can't take you seriously. Again...look at the science...it's just not there.


  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 5 • Views: 7,472 • Replies: 51

 
ehBeth
 
  7  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 12:29 pm
@benMak,
benMak wrote:

Woman are nothing more than sex toys,

I'm all for man and women equivalence


cool

as long as you understand than men are nothing more than sex toys
Germlat
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 12:46 pm
@benMak,
Yawn..this is like a female wearing a t-shirt that reads "classy lady" and criticizing she's not classy.....actually , you're statement is of a person who is extremely shallow. Do you think Beyoncé exemplifies all women? Ignorant, silly, shallow and most importantly sad...
cicerone imposter
 
  6  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 12:46 pm
@benMak,
Your concentration on "Women's Studies" misses the big picture.

1. Women graduate college at higher rates than men.
2. Women own one-third of all wealth in the US; given their late start, that's quite an accomplishment.
3. Women have been winning increasingly in politics.
4. Women have become CEO's of some of the biggest companies in the US.

What have "you" accomplished other than to denigrate women?
Lordyaswas
 
  6  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 12:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
He can rotate his head whilst making a buzzy noise.
0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 12:50 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Imagine his/her success as a mate! ....or a father/mother.
0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 01:07 pm
@Germlat,
Germlat wrote:

Yawn..this is like a female wearing a t-shirt that reads "classy lady" and criticizing she's not classy.....actually , you're statement is of a person who is extremely shallow. Do you think Beyoncé exemplifies all women? Ignorant, silly, shallow and most importantly sad...

I meant the poster not Beyoncé .
0 Replies
 
benMak
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 05:27 pm
@ehBeth,
--The One Line Quipper--: These jamoke's-in-training (JIT's) reply with one-liner comments. They argue a point with the smallest amount of words possible. Simple, concise, and beautiful, at least, that's the goal. They represent an unforced combination of the Dali Lama and a professional comedian. Although, this strategy may fail if put into the hands of an idiot, which may happen 99% of the time.


Hi ehBeth, thanks for replying!

Wait, you must be joking.....men as sex toys. How do I get to this strange world? Hold on just a sec.....is this like that weird Islam virgins upon death deal?

Ahhh who cares, it sounds like a utopia...please sign me up.

Errr, wait a sec. Who am I kidding? Unfortunately sexual selection, the way we've evolved, and the whole basis for our existence is playing with a different deck of cards. It would be nice, but no, nature didn't play out this way.
benMak
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 05:31 pm
@Germlat,
--The Tired Genius--: This internet forum entity is simply too tired to exercise their brain. Without a doubt, they've heard it all before, but strangely, their brain is so tired that they often struggle to make a reasonable argument.

Germlat, thanks for the reply!

The majority of your responses are a personal attack. This was expected (that's fine, I'll just ignore it as it does nothing for either of us, and honestly, this approach can't possibly help you in the long run), but don't you agree that anyone with a small amount of intelligence will see the fallacy in your argument?

Your first sentence is actually quite revealing, and it gives me faith that we can continue this argument. I'm actually a bit surprised that you brought it up...its almost like it was planned. Although, now is not the time to extend in that direction (judging by the responses, that time may never come).

I'd like to metion that I see you as the most intelligent one here, that part is clear. Alas, there are plenty of ignorant folk here as well, and this dance starts with them. Since I hope to see you again, I'll give you a heads up. Look at the chromosomes that differentiate the male and female sex, xx and xy. One of those combinations supports many variations, and the other, not so much. Amusingly, your argument supports mine, but like I said. This is not the time for those details.

Secondly, you addressed my interpretation of Beyonce.

Does she represent all women?
Of course not!

Does she represent modern feminism?
Of course, yep, clearly, affirmative, without a doubt.

Using mans (type::burly) logic, she must also represent the foundation that feminism was built upon, AKA: Womens Studies. If you read my initial post, carefully, you should realize my argument is targeting a bigger point. Beyonce is an example of an idea, she's a poster child for the illegitimate subject we've come to know as (modern) Women's Studies.
0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 05:33 pm
@benMak,
Well...all your idiocy can be succinctly wrapped up with a one liner response ..not my fault.
0 Replies
 
benMak
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 05:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
--The Left Field Shooter--: This individual often appears on message boards threads with a list of irrelevant statistics. However confused they may appear, one must be careful, as they often show up, unexpectedly, spouting nonsense that innocent bystander brains may soak up.

Hey cicerone imposter!

I think you're a bit confused about the issue, and I'm pretty sure that I've got the Mona Lisa hanging on my breath, and you've got a little 3” x 3” photo on yours. These four random statistics are somewhat interesting....I guess? Although, they really don't serve a purpose to the argument, that's for sure. What was your plan here? How did you want me to reply? Perhaps you think I'm against women, and you were going to set me straight with some random info?

Anyway, thanks for the statistics. It's the poor man's mathematics that social science relies on. Honestly I don't know what else to say..... I guess...have a good day?
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 05:53 pm
@benMak,
However way you wish to perceive it. Have a nice day!

0 Replies
 
Lustig Andrei
 
  4  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 06:17 pm
I'm wondering by what other name we know this poster. He is obviously no newby despite the fact that his profile says he only signed up 10/14/14. That the o.p. was a put-on should have been obvious from the first.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 06:32 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Who ever this guy is, he's blind as a bat; he can't see how men embarrass themselves all the time. He even thinks women are men's sex toys. I don't think his momma ever taught him about the birds and the bees.
firefly
 
  4  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 06:35 pm
Other than nononono, no one else spouts this crap, or starts this kind of thread. He keeps grinding this same idiotic personal axe over and over.

He must have an endless supply of sock puppets, but they all sound alike. Laughing We've just met another one. Laughing.

As for Beyoncé, she can afford to laugh off fools like that and call herself anything she wants to:
Quote:
As of late May 2013, her net worth is estimated to be $350 million. MTV estimated that by the end of 2014, Beyoncé would become the highest-paid black musician in history: she succeeded to do so in April 2014. In June 2014, Beyoncé ranked at #1 on the Forbes Celebrity 100 list, earning an estimated $115 million throughout June 2013 - June 2014. This in turn was the first time she had topped the Celebrity 100 list as well as being her highest yearly earnings to date.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyonc%C3%A9#Net_worth

Lustig Andrei
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 06:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I'm telling you, Tak -- don't take this clown seriously. We have no idea what he really thinks or believes. This is his only thread so far and he's testing the waters re: how far he can go and how many people will jump to the bait, i.e. feed the troll.
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 06:59 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
I don't take these jokers seriously. I just challenge their ignorance to make sure others see them for who they are.
firefly
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 07:00 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Quote:
This is his only thread so far...

Under this user name. Wink
Germlat
 
  2  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 07:03 pm
@firefly,
Given enough time, people show their characteristics.
0 Replies
 
Lustig Andrei
 
  2  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 07:07 pm
@firefly,
He sounds a bit like Romeo Fabulini but I'm far from sure about that.
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Farce
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/19/2019 at 09:34:33