I join in
fishin's opinion, and write separately only to add a few additional comments.
There is a tendency to view a "leak" as something undesirable and injurious. Our current president, for instance, vowed to stop such leaks of information when he came into office. But this administration has been just as leaky as previous administrations, for the simple reason that the leaking most often is done as a matter of policy, not as a matter of individual initiative. Leaks, in other words, are just as often done
for a government as they are done
to it.
For example, in
the most notorious case of a leak for the GWB administration, a newspaper columnist (Bob Novak) was informed by undisclosed White House officials that Valerie Plame, the wife of former ambassador Joseph Wilson, was actually a CIA operative. Now, it's quite possible that this information was divulged by a person acting on his or her own initiative (and thus acting directly contrary to the administration's "no leak" mandate). On the other hand, it's just as likely that the leak was
authorized as a means of advancing White House policy.
So, when is a leak illegal? Certainly, when it violates a specific law. Are all leaks the misdeeds of disgruntled individuals, acting contrary to orders? Hardly.