17
   

Vaping is all the rage!!

 
 
roger
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 03:23 am
@izzythepush,
That would be diacetyl. Generally Regarded as Safe by our Food and Drug Administration for food flavorings. Toxic with constant exposure and high concentration as used in the popcorn industry. I would avoid inhaling anything with a buttery or creamy flavor on general principles.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 04:29 am
@roger,
That sounds about right. They said it was fine if swallowed but not if inhaled. The other concern is that a lot of the vapours are flavoured, cherry, strawberry, etc. which would appeal to younger people.
roger
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 04:46 am
@izzythepush,
Kid stuff. Whenever I go to an ice cream shop, I always ask for unflavored.

Seriously, I'm not sure that many go into it if not as a substitute for smoking, and that includes the nicotine. If someone does go into it for the flavors, I would like to see the looks on their faces when they move up and taste a real cigarette. In other words, I doubt it's much of a gateway habit.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 04:48 am
@roger,
The evidence would suggest it's not.

I've never come across unflavoured ice cream. Over here it's always got some flavour even if it's only vanilla.
roger
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 04:54 am
@izzythepush,
Awright, already. I lied about the ice cream, but you get my point. Flavors are not just for the young.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 06:11 am
@roger,
I don't know about how things are done in America.

Maybe flavours aren't for the young. I wasn't arguing that point, just saying that concerns had been raised. What's of real concern is it's entirely unregulated, they sell them at car boots sales. You don't get that with tobacco and alcohol.

I think there's a difference between flavouring something and deliberately marketing it at kids. There was a big hoo ha about alco pops, alcoholic drinks that taste like soft drinks. I've just brewed some strawberry cider, and there's no mi9staking that for a soft drink. Alcohol should taste like alcohol.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 06:12 am
@Germlat,
shooting yourself in the head with a .45 IS more dangerous than shooting yourself in the head with a 9mm, yet I imgine that the longterm outcomes for both could be similar.
Germlat
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 06:40 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

edgarblythe wrote:

I just gave my personal take. I'm no doctor Welby or even Doc Holiday for that matter.

and maybe just maybe your opinion is based upon pure ignorance.

The American Lung Association states 90% of lung cancer due to smoking. I think it is irresponsible to advertise a product as a healthy alternative to smoking, when we simply don't know enough about it.
0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  0  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 06:51 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

Liquid nicotine is extracted from tobacco, but unlike tobacco leaves, liquid nicotine can be lethal. It can cause harm when it's inhaled, but it can also be harmful when ingested or absorbed through your skin. Only a small dose is dangerous -- less than one tablespoon of many of the e-liquids on the market is enough to kill an adult, and as little as a teaspoon could kill a child) [source: Richtel]. The number of calls to poison control centers regarding e-cigarette nicotine-infused liquids rose sharply every month between September 2010 and February 2014, from just one call per month to as many as 215 -- that's a rise from 0.3 percent to 41.7 percent of all emergency calls. As many as 51.1 percent of those calls involved accidental poisoning of kids under the age of 5 (roughly 42 percent involved adults age 20 or older) [source: CDC].
Some testing suggests it's not only the nicotine that may be dangerous. Certain e-cigarette devices may also release metals during use -- including tin in some cases -- as well as other impurities known to be toxic and/or carcinogenic.
Despite being on the market for several years, many regulatory agencies and health experts aren't sure just how safe e-cigarettes actually are. Among their concerns is the lack of disclosure of all the ingredients used as well as the lack of (or validity of) health and safety claims by manufacturers about their products. In 2009, for example, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found some cartridges of liquid nicotine contained about 1 percent diethylene glycol (DEG), a toxic chemical ingredient also found in antifreeze [source: FDA].
To make matters worse, the amount of nicotine listed on a cartridge label maynot match the actual amount in the cartridge. FDA testing has found cartridges under the same manufacturing label may release significantly different levels of nicotine, ranging from 26.8 to 43.2 micrograms nicotine per 100 milliliter puff. And those nicotine-free cartridges? Lab tests indicate you're still getting a low dose, despite the claims [source: FDA].

Interesting you mention this. I think the vaping community simply doesn't know exactly how much nicotine is being consumed. I think this could result in an increase of vascular illnesses.
0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  0  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 07:47 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

shooting yourself in the head with a .45 IS more dangerous than shooting yourself in the head with a 9mm, yet I imgine that the longterm outcomes for both could be similar.

What's interesting about vaping is people don't even understand how to gauge the caliber.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 07:50 am
I gave up a pack a day habit cold-turkey 45 years ago.

Then pot came into my life...and I smoked at least a joint (or several) a day from then on until about three four years ago...when I quit that cold-turkey.

A couple years ago I learned the pleasure of a cigar in the evening with a drink. Nancy hated the smell of the cigar for a while, but now seems resigned to it. Occasionally I will smoke one on the golf course during a round...but mostly that after dinner drink and cigar are my poisons.

If it shortens my life, so be it. Like Hawk, I think a it more important to enjoy the years you are alive than to give up some pleasures in favor of a possible longer life.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 07:57 am
It's possibly hard to enjoy such pleasures spending the last couple years of your life dying in agony from lung cancer.
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 08:10 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

It's possibly hard to enjoy such pleasures spending the last couple years of your life dying in agony from lung cancer.


That is why I also advocate for physician assisted suicide.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 11:18 am
This is the start of a timely great essay

Why I Hope to Die at 75

An argument that society and families—and you—will be better off if nature takes its course swiftly and promptly

Quote:
Seventy Five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.

This preference drives my daughters crazy. It drives my brothers crazy. My loving friends think I am crazy. They think that I can’t mean what I say; that I haven’t thought clearly about this, because there is so much in the world to see and do. To convince me of my errors, they enumerate the myriad people I know who are over 75 and doing quite well. They are certain that as I get closer to 75, I will push the desired age back to 80, then 85, maybe even 90.

I am sure of my position. Doubtless, death is a loss. It deprives us of experiences and milestones, of time spent with our spouse and children. In short, it deprives us of all the things we value.


But here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived. It robs us of our creativity and ability to contribute to work, society, the world. It transforms how people experience us, relate to us, and, most important, remember us. We are no longer remembered as vibrant and engaged but as feeble, ineffectual, even pathetic.

By the time I reach 75, I will have lived a complete life. I will have loved and been loved. My children will be grown and in the midst of their own rich lives. I will have seen my grandchildren born and beginning their lives. I will have pursued my life’s projects and made whatever contributions, important or not, I am going to make. And hopefully, I will not have too many mental and physical limitations. Dying at 75 will not be a tragedy. Indeed, I plan to have my memorial service before I die. And I don’t want any crying or wailing, but a warm gathering filled with fun reminiscences, stories of my awkwardness, and celebrations of a good life. After I die, my survivors can have their own memorial service if they want—that is not my business.

Let me be clear about my wish. I’m neither asking for more time than is likely nor foreshortening my life. Today I am, as far as my physician and I know, very healthy, with no chronic illness. I just climbed Kilimanjaro with two of my nephews. So I am not talking about bargaining with God to live to 75 because I have a terminal illness. Nor am I talking about waking up one morning 18 years from now and ending my life through euthanasia or suicide. Since the 1990s, I have actively opposed legalizing euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. People who want to die in one of these ways tend to suffer not from unremitting pain but from depression, hopelessness, and fear of losing their dignity and control. The people they leave behind inevitably feel they have somehow failed. The answer to these symptoms is not ending a life but getting help. I have long argued that we should focus on giving all terminally ill people a good, compassionate death—not euthanasia or assisted suicide for a tiny minority.

I am talking about how long I want to live and the kind and amount of health care I will consent to after 75. Americans seem to be obsessed with exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins and supplements, all in a valiant effort to cheat death and prolong life as long as possible. This has become so pervasive that it now defines a cultural type: what I call the American immortal.

I reject this aspiration. I think this manic desperation to endlessly extend life is misguided and potentially destructive. For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop.


http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/09/why-i-hope-to-die-at-75/379329/

I cant get too excited about getting told to forgo this fun or that fun in the pursuit of living longer. The fact that increasingly we outlive our funds just re enforces my apathy.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 04:15 pm
@hawkeye10,
I read that already, no need to put it in giant letters.
I've read quite a few knocks on that, not least re the writer's background/coalition. (no links, but look)

I'm about to be 73 and can kick ass off and on. Ok, now mostly off, but I've still some value to myself.

Tell a2k when you are 73 what you think, and I'll probably listen.

0 Replies
 
Germlat
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 05:44 pm
@Frank Apisa,
I believe in people having the right to live or die on their own terms. But...if people are misinformed or under informed then they aren't exercising a true choice.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 07:59 pm
@Germlat,
Germlat wrote:

I believe in people having the right to live or die on their own terms. But...if people are misinformed or under informed then they aren't exercising a true choice.

Nicely giving you and everyone else justification to take away my freedom on a whim. **** that. Stay out of my life unless I ask you for your help.
luismtzzz
 
  3  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 11:05 pm
@Germlat,
It is a good altenative to evade the carcinogens that are on tobacco. But what Edgar said about nicotine is right. Is a highly adictive substance that has multiple side effects and in high doses can be lethal. It actually kills the smoker very slowly, how fast the poison works depends on the dosis.

I shall explain shortly. Nicotine is an stimulant that overactivates the function of all most every electrical system of our body. Including heart, vessels, vowels, brain. The neuronal receptors that can be affected by nicotine are so abundnt that the scientists that described them named precisely after the drug Nicotine receptors, although they do not need nicotine to function properly.

It can be less harmful in a way but it does not eliminates all the health risks. Nicotine alone rises blood pessure, lowers the blood flow to the cardiac muscles, increases vowel movement, lowers kidney blood flow, makes cholesterol plaques in the artery walls to be more fagile, increases bad cholesterol lowers good cholesterol.

So using vaping only takes out part of the risk, and may help some individuals quit smoking. And it makes second hand smoke also less harmfull.





roger
 
  1  
Sat 27 Sep, 2014 11:41 pm
@luismtzzz,
Have you ever seen a study of the addictive properties of nicotine was studied apart from nicotine inhaled as part of the smoking process. I would much like to read such a report.
luismtzzz
 
  1  
Sun 28 Sep, 2014 12:40 am
@roger,
Le Houezec J (September 2003). "Role of nicotine pharmacokinetics in nicotine addiction and nicotine replacement therapy: a review". The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 7 (9): 811–9. PMID 12971663.

Kenny PJ, Markou A (Jun 2006). "Nicotine self-administration acutely activates brain reward systems and induces a long-lasting increase in reward sensitivity". Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (6): 1203–11. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300905. PMID 16192981.

I think that the second one answers better your question.
 

Related Topics

nicotine test - Question by conniesworld
List of smoking triggers - Discussion by Robert Gentel
who would use the "E-cigarette"? - Discussion by existential potential
Kicking the habit - Discussion by Cliff Hanger
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 11:10:52