water memory, not the first time I've heard of it. But it's 100% pure male cow feces.
So you watched the video and that was your conclusion?
There are aspects of the "experiment" that are sloppy.
Here is an example. You start with a dense concentrate of DNA right? Just how dense the DNA that is started with can have "contaminates".
So you go through their "magic" number of dilutions right? This is pure assumption that after this "magic" number of dilutions there "shouldn't" be any DNA molecules left. This is pure speculation. It is unknown weather there ARE or ARE NOT molecules. It is ASSUMED there are none.
This is called a fumble in logic. You are starting from the position that something is true, when it could be false.
Where are the tests to confirm no actual DNA molecules remain in the heavily diluted samples?
THIS IS THE ONLY way you can confirm if the experiment actually has a result. To ASSUME it has no remaining molecules causes the result to be tainted with bias. You don't have any result.
In other words it is pure male cow feces.
Do you want to know why he is willing to risk his "credibility" as a scientist?
Because finding the AIDs virus was a no brainier. The aids virus is huge as far as viruses go. It's not like fining a needle in a haystack, but instead its like finding a log in a haystack.
All it took was to have a patient that was exhibiting "unhealthy" symptoms give their blood sample. Analyzing the blood sample would narrow it down if anything "foreign" was in the sample. If there is anything within the blood sample that shouldn't be there it will be discovered. Since the HIV virus is extremely large it was easily found.
This wasn't a difficult task. It would be like going to a wrecking yard to find a car. You couldn't fail at this task.
That is why he is willing to risk his reputation. Because he has NO reputation.