53
   

What if no religions are correct, but there still is a God?

 
 
AugustineBrother
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jun, 2016 07:15 am
@neologist,
There are 4 logic problems with your question. If there is a God and most religions have God then unless God is unimportant then the religions get the most important thing right. I am using your 'logic'.

2) Do you mean All correct or all wrong. What in life is ever that way?

3) Even in the perfect religion, would anyone attain to the correct understanding.

4) Isn't that a question that can only be answered personally, Unless you are insinuating force against others because you assume that you are correct always


This is a very disturbing question because there is no thought but plenty of emotion
Thomas33
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Jul, 2016 05:27 pm
I 100% believe that to be the case. Religions are about as true as a videogame, however the reason for religion could very well be true.
God could exist, as a separate all-powerful force, but what's a logical view of God?

If God is the creator of evolution, as opposed to being the process of evolution itself, is that meant to imply that God wants to see trial and error, or that they themself aren't all-powerful?

Leadfoot
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 08:19 am
@Thomas33,
Quote:
If God is the creator of evolution, as opposed to being the process of evolution itself, is that meant to imply that God wants to see trial and error, or that they themself aren't all-powerful?

Pretty good summary. I think it's the first (trial and error), and that without interfearance.

I've heard many versions of 'All is one, we are one, we are God' but I don't think any are honest. The most ardent advocate of 'we are all powerful' can be brought down with something as simple and common as a broken heart.
Thomas33
 
  3  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 09:31 am
@Leadfoot,
I myself can't get my head around God wanting to see trial and error. At least, in the context that God doesn't need to see trial and error.

If God needs to see trial and error, what does that say about God? Overall I think there's a discrepancy between the reality of God as supreme and as a force that is dependent on a history of evolution.

What could the link be, between evolution and the source of existence?
rosborne979
 
  2  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 09:33 am
@Thomas33,
Or there is no God. That solves the problem too. You're just ignoring the obvious.
Thomas33
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 09:52 am
@rosborne979,
But then where does ability derive from?
Leadfoot
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 10:12 am
@Thomas33,
Quote:

What could the link be, between evolution and the source of existence?

I can't be sure, but I think evolution was for plausible deniability. There is to be no smoking gun evidence for the source of existence. 'Making the evidence fit the hypothesis'? Maybe, maybe not.

If we are to find God, it must be in a different realm than understanding our physical existence.
Thomas33
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 10:42 am
@Leadfoot,
I completely understand what you mean. Perhaps that's the whole point: maybe God never intended for us to know of their existence because that's the condition of our existence. Life forms in the universe knowing about the creator violates the ability of the universe, because perhaps God's being able to create meant their not being able to know the creation, therefore the universe not knowing its own anti could be the means to balance.

I personally think the source of existence needs to be replicated.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  2  
Reply Sat 2 Jul, 2016 01:45 pm
@Thomas33,
Thomas33 wrote:

But then where does ability derive from?

Everything is natural dude. God just isn't required. It's really not that complicated.
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2016 10:39 am
@AugustineBrother,
AugustineBrother wrote:
There are 4 logic problems with your question. . .
I know.
Why do you think I asked?
0 Replies
 
clueless7321
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Aug, 2016 09:14 pm
@neologist,
I think they are all bits and pieces to a bigger picture we can't see right now.
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Reply Thu 1 Sep, 2016 02:59 pm
@rosborne979,
Quote:
God just isn't required. It's really not that complicated.


Yep, life is so simple. Rocks and sun then add water - Poof! Life!
neologist
 
  2  
Reply Thu 1 Sep, 2016 06:00 pm
@Leadfoot,
You forgot lightning.
Wasn't there lightning?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  2  
Reply Thu 1 Sep, 2016 09:01 pm
@Leadfoot,
Leadfoot wrote:
Yep, life is so simple. Rocks and sun then add water - Poof! Life!

I know, I know, you prefer pure *Poofism* over chemistry and time. I just find it easier to believe that there are chemical processes we don't yet understand than I do the Magic Sky Wizard hypothesis.
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2016 12:42 am
@rosborne979,
Emphasis on the words "don't understand"
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2016 12:50 am
@neologist,
neologist wrote:

Emphasis on the words "don't understand"

Is that the special, secret phrase of the day?
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2016 04:33 am
When I was 4 and I used to hunt ants I was the God of the ant world...so what ?
...the kind of god ppl normally talk about if existing at all in any shape or form in relative relation to our place in reality is at best a big child. Now that out of the way talk about Being not god. The answer to that one gets far more tricky.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  2  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2016 04:48 am
@neologist,
neologist wrote:

Emphasis on the words "don't understand"

Emphasis on "Magic Sky Wizard"
Smileyrius
 
  3  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2016 04:55 am
@rosborne979,
rosborne979 wrote:

neologist wrote:

Emphasis on the words "don't understand"

Emphasis on "Magic Sky Wizard"


Emphasis on Emphasis
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 Sep, 2016 07:15 pm
When understanding fails, yell " magic sky wizard " or " There IS NO GOD!", your choice.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 04:24:26