Do you agree with Leibniz monads I would disagree

Reply Wed 28 May, 2014 11:11 pm
The Monadology is Leibniz’s account of his metaphysical thought, in which he states that that world is made up of an infinity of simple substances or ‘monads’. He believes that this is knowable a priori, which is characteristic of his rationalist views.

As defined in the Monadology ‘The monad … is nothing but a simple substance, which enters into composites’ . These simple substances are the basic constituents of reality for Leibniz, and it is a requirement that they are immaterial or non-physical. In contrast to the Cartesian idea of matter, Leibniz claims monads are the only genuine substance, so the type of matter discussed by Descartes of which extension is an integral part, does not therefore qualify as genuine substance. Due to the fact that monads have no physical form, it follows that they cannot be extended, divided nor changed in any way. Leibniz consistently maintains that substances are true unities, which he terms unities per se, which cannot be aggregates like extended matter. Rather, aggregates are built from these much more simple, basic things, which for Leibniz are the elements of true reality. He saw aggregates themselves as phenomena.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 966 • Replies: 0
No top replies


Related Topics

statistics help!!! please?! - Question by hellyathisissick
Jacob Have I Loved - Question by helphelphelphelp
The Hobbit..PLEASE HELP!!! - Question by Accalia
General Statistics - Question by usmanmani
Culture - Question by lucky0510
Lumper services - Question by Shwets
Need help with a corporate finance problem - Question by chatterjeer
history - Question by dwaynewade
firstness, secondness, thirdness - Question by goldenbear
  1. Forums
  2. » Do you agree with Leibniz monads I would disagree
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/25/2022 at 12:06:55