Dimensional premise

What we experience as the universe is not even categorizable as a true singularity. This has to be said before people start saying that our theory is multiversal. What we experience as a so-called universe is a mere slice of an absolute state that itself MAY BE CATEGORIZABLE as a "singularity" in a temporal sense. This is how it can appear to us that a reality is actively occurring when there is no rational premise for an actively evolving universe opposed to one that is static.
What would be the context for existence with function ? And what would be the context for function prior to the big bang? The lack of true singularity for our universe displays itself to us as a realm bound in the character of such a thing as being,oppsed to nonbeingness or nothingness(im talking about cause and effect, systematic laws,all are "observable).The little caveats like the big bang having no "origin" and the uncausative behavior of the subplank length universe speaks directly to our universe's true lack of independent singularity,but this is not enough in this little post, to get the full explanation the late march release of "Absolute Physics " will be more than sufficient.

Arcades Cinza