0
   

THE COSMOLOGICAL PARALLEL

 
 
Arcades
 
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:03 pm
When we look at the organic cellular structure we see where the construction of organic objects, unlike the structure inorganic objects, possess the capacity to progress beyond the level of the molecule. The cell is the definition of the animate object.this capacity must stem from the animate atom systematic.there are fundamental differences in the animate and the inanimate objects atomic operation as a system that allow the upper levels of construct-ability.the postulation is that atmospheric lightning in a time in the earths development struck the ocean waters and the atoms of these waters were altered in a chain reaction much like how they got the first atomic bomb to finally work after several failed attempts
Given that the animate atom relates inanimate atomic structures(all of so-called reality except humans) as its structural comparative ,along with space and time as what is termed as a reality(the entirety of the cosmos) through temporality ,where temporality is a direct result of the animate atomic structure as a systems : inanimate systems ,space ,and time are conformations to the capacity of the animate atom as the animate atom is not an ultimate structure(the human construct is merely a facet in the universe when it is seen accurately as a single system .Observed existence would have to be a correlate of the disticnt elementary infrastructure of the animate atom. Space, matter and time do not present the animate atom materially;it is the animate atom in extension of the temporality that coheres existencia Existencia would have to be prodictive .the initiative of a history of existencia ,
with existencia being of a particular
functional capacity and structural parameter that follows from a capacitated beginning to the state of the animate atoms emergence , (during the formation of the early earth)emanates from the animate with fundamental definitves :space ,matter ,nonspatial time ,that can only be sourced to the animate atomic systematic itself as temporality details it and a said reality.
Modern and classical science in which the comprehensive localization, descriptivity and comparative distinctivity of the animate atom are undiscovered, but are the dictates of the source
of temporality as the so-called spatial commencement of existencia(the big bang) where time ,matter and space are inherent features that acted in precise functionality to eventually formalize a said animate atomic systemic.If the animate atom pellucidates itself as existent in matter ,space and time, as animacy does explicity in socalled observation, then a non-sequitur unrenders the sequence of logical analysis that is a socalled start and continuation of a so-called cosmologic reality
The elementary facet of a system ,whether singularly or part-cooptively,cannot be of the ability to exibit its own structure in absoluteness ,but a idiosyncratic perlucidity. for it is the totality inherent in the systematic emanting from all facets working as a total processivity,which we can see the temporal facet is not in that which is termed as cosmological reality, that is the constructing capacity of a system.
Appertaining to temporal capacity there is not a reductive compartmentalization in effect - temporality is a strict immediate capacity . it is this conduction that is supposed as the lucidator of inanimacy ,space and time(reality) as invariable conformation output ,but this immediate capacity(the consciousness, that is a material system of atoms when seen basally)exstructuralizing its source as a particular construct invariably invalidates the construct ,which in this case the animate atom and its exponentiality of existence: time space matter and the very conducting capacity.said cosmological reality as is classically thought,therefore the entirety of so-called cosmological existence,as presented by the isolated material system known as the consciousness,is an invalidate construct,meaning that thinking that existence "started" with a big bang and evolved over "time" is not only an incorrect perception,but it is also a "systematically accurate" coherence.

Arcades Cinza
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 742 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Arcades
 
  0  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2014 09:39 am
@Arcades,
Infinity mathematicalizes the unknown in terms of applied math. But what I am saying is that the origins of infinity is quite dubious at best .why is this such an esteemed concept?
0 Replies
 
Arcades
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jul, 2014 12:39 pm
@Arcades,
There are more things to be said in this thread in the further explanation of the analogic universe and the nonium
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE COSMOLOGICAL PARALLEL
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 12:55:59