the idea of noncentrality

you want to know if time can be outside. only in a two dimensional universe.

It's kind of astounding that you'd write this without giving a clear definition of "centrality."

The horizon.
The horizon problem in physics is easy to understand, light from distant enough events can't reach us until long after the event has occurred, therefore we are not affected causally by this event, even though our place in the universe had shared a technical simultaneity with the event .
Limiting cause and effect to the speed of the photon is illogical because the photon was created by a perforce mechanism, that we are claiming has now been exceeded by its product? Any construction would have to be, in the most literal sense, an interpretation of the producing construct, an interpretation that cannot rationally exceed the capacity of its source, the presentation of the source Reason being that the presentation of the source must be prior to any product that the source can produce, meaning that if you are to make something you have to be here to make it is what I am saying.
This perforce mechanism was causal. Given this to be true, the prime intrinsics of causality, which we have to assume to be the symmetry breaking effect that initiated the big bang, has only produced interpretations of the actual breaking, rather than the symmetry that broke.
The symmetry is postulated to have been in and of itself , then it broke, without warning, without definable precipitations. This sounds more like a religious tenet rather than acceptable scientific principle. Not that religious tenet is to spat on, but science has begin to appear less dependent on the many leaps of faith it has inconspicuously inserted into its academic annals. This is how it is for now.

Do we live in a strictly interpretive medium? Yes.
You see, an original state must remain symmetrically uncompromised. Original state would have to show itself to be non-operational on all counts for the reason being that the ultimate state must logically not be characterized in any part by an ongoing, definitive operance, that always leave the reasoning wanting for a prior or underlying source state consequently.
Our effect on the future, or the effects of past events on the present cannot be reduced to the speed of the photon, unless the very first thing the breaking of the symmetry created was a photon( even then though, there has to be a series of capacities that 'effect' faster than photons can, the symmetry was a composite structure, holding together prior to breaking , doesn't that holding together take some sort of causal functioning , before the photon had come into existence ).
If we can even judge what first happened. We can't explain, in Terms of material progression in time, what happened prior to planck time using the methodology of pre-millennium science.