6
   

Can Medicine Ever Extend the Human Lifespan?

 
 
Reply Sun 2 Feb, 2014 11:29 am
Will it ever be possible to increase the human lifespan by slowing down aging? Could medical science ever accomplish this or is it so improbable as to be unworthy of research? Is there anything available now that can slow the aging process? If such a thing were available would you take it? What about the claims by the manufacturers of nutritional supplements that some of their products have an effect on aging? Are any of them valid?

The Aging Process
The search for a single cause of aging has been replaced by the view of aging as an extremely complex, multifactorial process. It is very likely that several processes simultaneously interact and that more than one of the prevailing explanations of aging may be simultaneously true.

The free radical theory of aging states that organisms age because cells accumulate free radical damage over time. A free radical is any atom or molecule that has a single unpaired electron in an outer shell. Most biologically-relevant free radicals are highly reactive and react chemically with the biological structures with which they come in contact. For most biological structures, free radical damage is closely associated with oxidative damage. Strictly speaking, the free radical theory is only concerned with free radicals such as superoxide ( O2- ), but it has since been expanded to encompass oxidative damage from other reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or peroxynitrite (OONO-). Denham Harman first proposed the free radical theory of aging in the 1950s, and in the 1970s extended the idea to implicate mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species. Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) is a method of measuring antioxidant content of biological samples. Studies at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University in Boston suggest that consuming fruits and vegetables with a high ORAC value may help slow the aging process in both body and brain. Other research has shown that in middle-aged rats, foods with a high ORAC value can reduce loss of long-term memory and learning ability, maintain the ability of brain cells to respond to stimuli (thought to decrease with age) and protect blood vessels against oxygen damage.

Another component of aging is cross-linking. Cross-linking as an aging mechanism was first proposed in 1942 by Johan Bjorksten. He applied this theory to aging diseases such as sclerosis, a declining immune system and the most obvious example of cross-linking, loss of elasticity in the skin. Collagen is one of the most common proteins found in the skin, tendons, ligaments, bone and cartilage. Collagen and elastin proteins are highly susceptible to an internal chemical reaction within the body called glycation. This is a reaction that takes place between free amino groups in proteins and a sugar such as glucose, resulting in the cross-linking of protein fibers, the loss of elasticity and changes in the dermis associated with the aging process. In young people there are few cross-links and the fibers are free to move up and down. The collagen stays soft and pliable. With age however the number of cross-links increase, causing the skin to shrink and become less soft and pliable. It is thought that these cross-links also begin to obstruct the passage of nutrients and waste between cells.

Other major theories of aging include the DNA damage theory of aging, the immunologic theory, the inflammation theory, etc.

Some nutritional supplements available today:

Resveratrol
Resveratrol is a member of a group of plant compounds called polyphenols. These compounds are thought to have antioxidant properties, protecting the body against the kind of damage linked to increased risk for conditions such as cancer and heart disease. Resveratrol is found in the skin of red grapes, but other sources include peanuts and berries. Resveratrol works by acting on the SIRT1 gene, a gene that is believed to control the function and longevity of cells.

In 2003, Howitz and David Sinclair reported that resveratrol significantly extends the lifespan of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sinclair later reported that resveratrol also prolongs the lifespan of the worm, Caenorhabditis elegans, and the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. In 2007, a different group of researchers were able to reproduce Sinclair's results with C. elegans, but other groups could not achieve consistent increases in lifespan of D. melanogaster, other flies, or C. elegans. The first demonstration of life extension by resveratrol supplementation in a vertebrate was obtained in 2006. In a short-lived fish, Nothobranchius furzeri, with a median life span of nine weeks, a maximal dose of resveratrol increased the median lifespan by 56%.

Carnosine
Carnosine is a substance produced naturally by the body. Classified as a dipeptide (a compound made up of two linked amino acid molecules), carnosine is highly concentrated in muscle tissue and in the brain. Laboratory research on cell life indicates that L-Carnosine has the ability to rejuvenate cells approaching old age, restoring normal appearance and extending cellular life span. In fact it can actually recover old cells to approximately 90 percent of its original youthful state. This appears to be done mainly through anti-glycalation and anti-oxidation.

Benfotiamine
Benfotiamine is a slightly altered derivative of vitamin B1, thiamine. It may slow down the progress of one of the components of the aging process.

In the recent years, the role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) has been increasingly discussed in skin aging, and the potential of anti-AGE strategies has received high interest from pharmaceutical companies for the development of novel anti-aging cosmeceutical compounds. Glycation is the result of typically covalent bonding of a protein or lipid molecule with a sugar molecule, such as fructose or glucose. Glycation occurs when the sugar molecules permanently attach to collagen present in the skin and other parts of the body. At the point of attachment, there is a small mechanism creating inflammation. In addition to inflammation, glycation also causes cross-linking in our collagen, making it stiff and inflexible where it was once soft and supple.This extensive cross-linking of collagen causes the loss of skin elasticity.Healthy collagen strands normally slide over one another, which keeps skin elastic. If a young person smiles or frowns, creating lines in the face, the skin will snap back and be smooth again when he stops smiling or frowning. But the skin does not snap back out in a person whose collagen has been crosslinked from years of eating sugar and the wrong carbs. Those deep grooves remain, because that is where the sugar molecules have attached to collagen, making the fibers stiff and inflexible.

Benfotiamine blocks destructive biochemical pathways that enable high blood sugar levels to damage nerves and small blood vessels. Benfotiamine also inhibits the formation of advanced glycation end products in both diabetic and normal aging organisms. Glycation not only causes kidney, nerve, and retinal damage in diabetics, but is also a significant contributory factor in cardiovascular disease and other aging disorders in adults without diabetes.

NAD
Researchers say a major component of aging in mammals may be reversible and the key is the chemical nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, abbreviated NAD+, a coenzyme found in all living cells. It facilitates cell communication. Researchers from a joint project of the University of New South Wales and Harvard University in America found that the tissue of two-year-old mice given the NAD-producing compound for just one week resembled that of six-month-old mice. They also found that young mice given the same compound became "supercharged" in some ways, suggesting that the technique could have benefits for young, healthy humans as well.

The researchers are now looking at the longer-term outcomes of the NAD-producing compound in mice and how it affects the mouse as a whole, including whether it will give the mice a longer, healthier life. The researchers hope to start clinical trials on humans late in 2014.

“There’s clearly much more work to be done here, but if those results stand, then aging may be a reversible condition, if it is caught early,” says Professor David Sinclair. The team's study is published in the journal "Cell."


Is any of this valid or is it just wishful thinking? Will medicine ever be able to slow aging? How about reversing aging?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 6 • Views: 3,424 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Feb, 2014 11:35 am
@Brandon9000,
Given how much medicine/science has done in the last 100 years to extend the average life, I think the answer to your thread title has to be yes.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Feb, 2014 11:42 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

Given how much medicine/science has done in the last 100 years to extend the average life, I think the answer to your thread title has to be yes.

Yes. However, what medicine has done is to give people a greater chance of reaching the maximum human lifespan. What about increasing the maximum human lifespan?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Feb, 2014 12:02 pm
@Brandon9000,
The NAD route seems the most promising to me right now.

If you had asked me a few years ago about this I would have been far more cynical about the prospects, but the latest research has forced me to reevaluate the probabilities and the timeframe.

I'm now leaning toward the answer being "yes" within a 100 year (or less) timeframe.

This also happened recently: http://www.kurzweilai.net/stress-turns-ordinary-cells-pluripotent
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  0  
Reply Sun 2 Feb, 2014 03:55 pm
One-hundred years ago there were two billion people on the planet. Now there are seven billion. That's somewhat less than doubling twice in 100 years. So, assuming it is a geometric progression, there could be 24-25 billion on the planet. Who grows enough food for that population?

My point is that if there is an extension in the lifespan, I would not think everyone will get told. It might just be the next "in the closet" life secret (old, but few know). The 1% may eventually have little to do with wealth, but one's secret age? Just my musings.
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Jun, 2014 01:41 pm
@Brandon9000,
Bran thank you most kindly, I have saved it for future scrutiny
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Wed 2 Oct, 2024 03:28 am
‘The data on extreme human ageing is rotten from the inside out’ – Ig Nobel winner Saul Justin Newman

Quote:
From the swimming habits of dead trout to the revelation that some mammals can breathe through their backsides, a group of leading leftfield scientists have been taking their bows at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the 34th annual Ig Nobel Prize ceremony. Not to be confused with the actual Nobel prizes, the Ig Nobels recognise scientific discoveries that “make people laugh, then think”.

We caught up with one of this year’s winners, Saul Justin Newman, a senior research fellow at the University College London Centre for Longitudinal Studies. His research finds that most of the claims about people living over 105 are wrong.


How did you find out about your award?

I picked up the phone after slogging through traffic and rain to a bloke from Cambridge in the UK. He told me about this prize and the first thing I thought of was the lady who collected snot off of whales and the levitating frog. I said, “absolutely I want to be in this club”.

What was the ceremony like?

The ceremony was wonderful. It’s a bit of fun in a big fancy hall. It’s like you take the most serious ceremony possible and make fun of every aspect of it.

But your work is actually incredibly serious?

I started getting interested in this topic when I debunked a couple of papers in Nature and Science about extreme ageing in the 2010s. In general, the claims about how long people are living mostly don’t stack up. I’ve tracked down 80% of the people aged over 110 in the world (the other 20% are from countries you can’t meaningfully analyse). Of those, almost none have a birth certificate. In the US there are over 500 of these people; seven have a birth certificate. Even worse, only about 10% have a death certificate.

The epitome of this is blue zones, which are regions where people supposedly reach age 100 at a remarkable rate. For almost 20 years, they have been marketed to the public. They’re the subject of tons of scientific work, a popular Netflix documentary, tons of cookbooks about things like the Mediterranean diet, and so on.

Okinawa in Japan is one of these zones. There was a Japanese government review in 2010, which found that 82% of the people aged over 100 in Japan turned out to be dead. The secret to living to 110 was, don’t register your death.

The Japanese government has run one of the largest nutritional surveys in the world, dating back to 1975. From then until now, Okinawa has had the worst health in Japan. They’ve eaten the least vegetables; they’ve been extremely heavy drinkers.

What about other places?

The same goes for all the other blue zones. Eurostat keeps track of life expectancy in Sardinia, the Italian blue zone, and Ikaria in Greece. When the agency first started keeping records in 1990, Sardinia had the 51st highest old-age life expectancy in Europe out of 128 regions, and Ikaria was 109th. It’s amazing the cognitive dissonance going on. With the Greeks, by my estimates at least 72% of centenarians were dead, missing or essentially pension-fraud cases.

What do you think explains most of the faulty data?

It varies. In Okinawa, the best predictor of where the centenarians are is where the halls of records were bombed by the Americans during the war. That’s for two reasons. If the person dies, they stay on the books of some other national registry, which hasn’t confirmed their death. Or if they live, they go to an occupying government that doesn’t speak their language, works on a different calendar and screws up their age.

According to the Greek minister that hands out the pensions, over 9,000 people over the age of 100 are dead and collecting a pension at the same time. In Italy, some 30,000 “living” pension recipients were found to be dead in 1997.

Regions where people most often reach 100-110 years old are the ones where there’s the most pressure to commit pension fraud, and they also have the worst records. For example, the best place to reach 105 in England is Tower Hamlets. It has more 105-year-olds than all of the rich places in England put together. It’s closely followed by downtown Manchester, Liverpool and Hull. Yet these places have the lowest frequency of 90-year-olds and are rated by the UK as the worst places to be an old person.

The oldest man in the world, John Tinniswood, supposedly aged 112, is from a very rough part of Liverpool. The easiest explanation is that someone has written down his age wrong at some point.

But most people don’t lose count of their age…

You would be amazed. Looking at the UK Biobank data, even people in mid-life routinely don’t remember how old they are, or how old they were when they had their children. There are similar stats from the US.

What does this all mean for human longevity?

The question is so obscured by fraud and error and wishful thinking that we just do not know. The clear way out of this is to involve physicists to develop a measure of human age that doesn’t depend on documents. We can then use that to build metrics that help us measure human ages.

Longevity data are used for projections of future lifespans, and those are used to set everyone’s pension rate. You’re talking about trillions of dollars of pension money. If the data is junk then so are those projections. It also means we’re allocating the wrong amounts of money to plan hospitals to take care of old people in the future. Your insurance premiums are based on this stuff.

What’s your best guess about true human longevity?

Longevity is very likely tied to wealth. Rich people do lots of exercise, have low stress and eat well. I just put out a preprint analysing the last 72 years of UN data on mortality. The places consistently reaching 100 at the highest rates according to the UN are Thailand, Malawi, Western Sahara (which doesn’t have a government) and Puerto Rico, where birth certificates were cancelled completely as a legal document in 2010 because they were so full of pension fraud. This data is just rotten from the inside out.

Do you think the Ig Nobel will get your science taken more seriously?

I hope so. But even if not, at least the general public will laugh and think about it, even if the scientific community is still a bit prickly and defensive. If they don’t acknowledge their errors in my lifetime, I guess I’ll just get someone to pretend I’m still alive until that changes.

theconversation
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Wed 2 Oct, 2024 07:48 am
@hightor,
This is true. I speak from experience for I have been dead for almost 30 years.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Getting Old Sucks - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Coping, the backside of prime - Discussion by wayne
Caroline's problem?? - Question by gungasnake
What is the oldest age you would like to be alive? - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Embarrassing and Upsetting Senior Moments - Discussion by Phoenix32890
It's all down hill after 40 - Discussion by martybarker
50 Great Things About Women Over 50 - Discussion by Robert Gentel
What keeps you young? - Question by Seed
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Can Medicine Ever Extend the Human Lifespan?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 02:50:59