@Frank Apisa,
I've finished most of what I wanted to do in this thread, as follows:
1. I've proven that you don't have a clue why you "treat the word know differently", other than because Fresco and cie. cowed you into it. In other words, it is merely a defense mechanism against other posters: you say that you know nothing so that others won't have anything to argue against... Nothing even remotely philosophical or even sincere about that.
2. I have proven that you came up with that issue just as a way to prevent discussion, and not as a way to foster discussion, since evidently you did not want to discuss your own point. Getting you to discuss it was like pulling a teeth from a hippopotamus, as everyone noticed.
3. I have proven that you use despicable tactics to put down other posters when they disagree with you. Your nastiness towards Joe Nation ("Why aren't crying on a train somewhere?" - now that was disgusting), Ossobuco and myself was noticed by all. Even your constant repeating of the same tired cliche, over and over again, is obviously meant as an insult for your opponents' intelligence.
4. And I derived a lot of fun from doing the above.
The only unfinished business of sorts is that you were alone in that discussion. More articulate posters, who share your use of philosophy as sort of literary sudoku with no impact on life whatsoever, did not show up to defend you... Too bad, for that could have allowed for an interesting philosophical discussion about life and philosophy. Another time maybe! :-)
