The atheist argument - explanation and advice.

Your arguments are silly and rather pathetic.

The really neat thing about atheism is that an atheist has no need for silly explanations like you are trying to make. If you want to be an intellect in support of your beliefs, you need more practice and a better argument . Your arguments are silly and rather pathetic.

I have never challenged the idea of Unity nor the idea of a Set of all Sets...I just don't ascribe it any particular ordering or Logos that fits in a specific philosophy of being. I don't intend to make a description of "God" beyond those two initial assertions and neither should you.

There is nothing paradoxical in set of sets per se...the incompleteness problem was not what I was aiming at.

If you want a subjective statement from me I give you one:
"God" is not a person nor an agent !

That's where you get it wrong...experience is an ongoing unfolding process while "God" is eternal.
God is the reason there is unfolding experiencing, the unmoved mover.

God does not evolve, it incorporates evolution.

God does not grow out of itself. There is nothing beyond it towards where to move.

God does not need to think, it questions nothing. Rather is the reason incomplete beings think and make questions.

God has Truth is essentially motionless, it opposes the illusion of motion.

The Logos in God is unchangeable as God is the all history of Logos made thing.

You want me to keep up teaching you Metaphysics and Theology at a top level or do you had enough ?

That is your problem not mine.
You projected a vision of God from a human perspective of existenz.
I am not interested in debating godly "like" creatures but God.

No one is trying to invalidate personnel experience.

That's where you get it wrong...experience is an ongoing unfolding process while "God" is eternal.
God is the reason there is unfolding experiencing, the unmoved mover.

God does not evolve, it incorporates evolution.

God does not grow out of itself. There is nothing beyond it towards where to move.

God does not need to think, it questions nothing. Rather is the reason incomplete beings think and make questions.

God has Truth is essentially motionless, it opposes the illusion of motion.

The Logos in God is unchangeable as God is the all history of Logos made thing.

You want me to keep up teaching you Metaphysics and Theology at a top level or do you had enough ?

The atheist position is either
1) absurd (not believing in a spatial and temporal God) or
2) unsound (not believing in an experience of God).

No one is trying to invalidate personnel experience.
As far as I am concerned you can experience whatever fantasy you like. Fantasies are real experiences, in the sense they are REAL fantasies.

This clown keeps offering straw man arguments. He doesn't seem to understand that there really is no such thing as "atheism." Atheists are only atheists by the description of theists, who want to emphasize that these are people who don't buy their big sky daddy claims. There is no "-ism" because it's not a belief, it is a lack of belief. Certainly there are thoes who say that there is no god. Although they are described as atheists, and are in a certain respect, they wold be more accurately described as anti-theists.

I don't know if there is a god, and i don't care. I don't believe, and if theists want to call me names because of that, it's no skin off my nose. This clown has no argument, and has to make sh*t up to have something to argue against.