FBM wrote:Last I heard from any of the others who've been posting, they thought you were a flake from page 1 and haven't changed their view about that at all. Much less their view of your multi-fallacious arguement.Quote:1. You are not empowered to speak on behalf of all the others, especially without their knowledge and consent to do so.
Haven't you been reading the posts about you? There's not a single one who thinks you have a valid argument. Read the thread! I'm not speaking for them; they're speaking for themselves, and the consensus is that you're wacko. They'll be able to read what I say when they come back to this thread. Nothing hidden about what I'm saying.
Quote:2. I became a flake from the moment I started talking with you - touch pitch and be defiled.
You became a flake when you started believing alien/ILF/gods are magically, secretly teleporting instructions about the structure of the universe, or whatever that mish-mash of crap you posted was meant to say. You intensified your flakiness in step with developing your stubborn denialism. You became a dangerous flake when you extended that denialism to include medical science.
FBM wrote:The only belief I've stated is that your argument is **** compared to that for the scientific models.Quote:What 'scientific models' you are talking about - you hardly understand more that 1% of what these models are claiming.
Read the thread. Pay attention. I'm under no obligation to keep linking you to the same data every time you demand it. And I notice you're reverting back to the same old argumentum ad ignorantium again. Pity.
FBM wrote:Get some evidence to show us something about your god/alien/ILF hypothesisQuote:Why do you need that evidence for ... and what do you accept as evidence? Why don't you confess that the fake inference by analogy over inverted physical processes (that nobody can tell for sure whether they are feasible in the real world or not) is the only type of evidence that you accept?
What sort of evidence do you accept such that you believe in global warming? Observation? Experimentation? Necessary, non-fallacious inference based on observation and/or experimentation? Something like that would be pretty nice, if it supported your alien/ILF/god-thing. Still waiting...
FBM wrote:Why don't you constrain of speaking on behalf of yourself, only.Read the thread! I'm not speaking for them; they're speaking for themselves
... and the consensus is that you're wacko.
If you are curious to know the consensus about you is not very much different.
You became a flake when you started believing alien/ILF/gods are magically, secretly teleporting instructions about the structure of the universe
... It doesn't matter whether the instructions have been secret or not - the truth of the matter is that you cannot explain how and from where all that Information has come from ... and how much it has been 4.38 bya, if it is continuously lost ever since (according to the second law of thermodynamics).
You became a dangerous flake when you extended that denialism to include medical science.
I can't understand exactly what you are denying: do you deny only the existence of God, or you deny the Intelligence as possible means of Creation, or perhaps you deny the climate change, or maybe you deny that the climate change can have negative effect on the biosphere, or what? What exactly are you denying?
FBM wrote:... and why don't you explain how you, in the capacity of having no medical background, have been able to assess statements about combinatorial genetics?Why don't you restrain yourself to providing evidence for your god/alien/ILF-of-the-gaps?
That's true. I also consider you a wacko. Reasons already given.
If you have such brilliant mental functionality, as you present yourself to have, why are you so interested in the 'wacko' problems?
I've made it very clear. I'm denying that you have an argument comparable to that of the scientists.
... and I am denying that you are able to understand what those scientists are saying at all.
You claim alien/ILF/god-of-the-gaps.
No, I don't claim anything of the kind.
What I claim is that you cannot exclude 100 % the option of having encoded communications in the data collected from the radio-telescope. I claim that you will never be able to prove that our conscience is 100% autonomous. I claim that you have no idea of what the theories that you so jealously believe in are actually claiming. ... and I also claim that you don't possess the qualification and the IQ to make psychiatric diagnoses online ... unless you dispose with some other disinformation and misrepresentation of data.
...because in the theory of Evolution only the predators survive ...
... my personal are God or some meta-intelligence (string theory) or s.th.; 30% another ILF, sending the designs on the Earth even through some form of teleportation or another form of encoded communication (it might have extinct already by the time the information has came here), and perhaps 25% of the Big Bang and the theory that we are made out of star dust (whatever this might mean) and fused with the time by the Dark Energy and Dark Matter....
FBM wrote:I have a degree in medical technology. Ask a specific question.Quote:... and where have you acquired that degree: in the classical high school or in the Faculty of Philosophy that you are studying at present?
A specific question about medical science, you maroon.
FBM wrote:This has already been explained to you numerous times in explicit detail.Quote:Can you write in no more than 25 words without any external references, what exactly is standing behind that 'this'?
I sympathize with you if that's the limit of your intellectual capacity, but I am under no obligation to obey your restrictions, nor to repeat myself endlessly. Read the thread and pay attention this time.
FBM wrote:I've made it very clear. I'm denying that you have an argument comparable to that of the scientists.Quote:... and I can tell you seriously that you don't have the IQ capacity to make that assessment. You have no reasoning functionality to make logical inferences ... even for the purposes of philosophy. BTW, where is you Buddhist humiliation, your peace of mind with yourself and with the world, your harmony with Nature and with the biosphere - you are full of aggression and disrespect to everything ... and from time to time have some problems with the concentration. All that you believe in at present is money and power and nothing else.
Not hungry for red herring today, thanks. You can't explain why greenhouse gases absorb and emit radiation in the thermal infrared spectrum, nor can you explain the assumptions that scientists make in order to validate their global warming story. Therefore, there is no global warming and you're completely wrong for blindly trusting the scientists.
...What I claim is that you cannot exclude 100 % the option of having encoded communications in the data collected from the radio-telescope. I claim that you will never be able to prove that our conscience is 100% autonomous. ...
Raëlians believe that alien scientists designed humans. I went to one of their meetings.
I’m 15 minutes early for the November Raëlian meditation gathering. I have no idea what to expect. Aside from a few visits to church as a kid, I’ve never attended a spiritual meeting, let alone one for a group that Wikipedia describes as a “UFO religion.”
The Raëlian movement is far from conventional. It was founded by a man named Claude Vorilhon who once ran a successful car racing magazine in France called Autopop.
That changed in December 1973, when Vorilhon says he had an encounter with an extraterrestrial named Yahweh who explained the true origins of life on Earth, and tasked him with spreading those teachings.
Within a year, Vorilhon had given up his magazine, published a book about what he learned from Yahweh, and changed his name to Raël. He started making appearances on French radio and TV, and soon gained a following.
Raël writes in one of his books, Intelligent Design, that all living things on Earth were designed thousands of years ago by the scientists of an advanced civilization on another planet. They’re called the Elohim, a phrase that Raël says meant “those who came from the sky” in Ancient Hebrew.
According to Intelligent Design, many deities and prophets from various cultures were really Elohim messengers. Each one told the human race what was appropriate for that stage in our species’ development. Now that we’ve developed enough, Raël says the Elohim would like to meet us and have us know the truth.
Raëlians believe the Elohim will only come to Earth if humans show that we want them to. To do this, we must build an embassy. That’s the mission of the Raëlian movement. Believers have sent requests to governments all over the world for the land and rights needed to build the embassy.
A paper published by Washington and Lee University estimates that there are currently around 60,000 Raëlians in over 100 countries.
...
