Quote:You are not the case 'Anything we cannot explain'. You are the case 'We explain everything with any logic (no matter whether full of contradictions or not ... on the basis of which can be inferred anything)' - but this is another case.Anything we cannot explain is 'God did it'
Merry Holidays
What I can explain with logic - and have repeatedly done so - is how fallacious and irrelevant your claims are.
Perhaps you don't understand something - logic here means formal model (for representation and understanding of the world). The math logic is the use and study of valid reasoning - this is a whole branch in the applied mathematics & computer science. Valid reasoning means with defined variables, defined & verified (even validated) assumptions (initial justification), inference engine based on a set of finite and explicitly stated logical rules, lack of any contradictions in the inference engine, etc.
FBM wrote:... the math logic. O.K. let's see what is there in the classical (and standard) physics. We have laws for the conservation of energy/mass/momentum, right? Do you know what does that mean:...Says who?
Not to mention that you don't even know how much of the information about the history record of the Universe you might have irretrievably lost in-between.
Does the universe obey the energy conservation law by a constant mass
or an increasing mass with radius during its evolution?
Akinbo Ojo
Standard Science Centre
P.O. Box 3501, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria
[email protected]
Abstract
How the energy conservation law is obeyed by the universe during its evolution is an important but not yet unanimously resolved question. Does the universe have a constant mass during its evolution or has its mass been increasing with its radius? Here, we evaluate the two contending propositions within the context of the Friedmann equations and the standard big bang theory. We find that though both propositions appeal to the Friedmann equations for validity, an increasing mass with increasing radius is more in harmony with the thermal history of the big bang model. In addition, temperature and flatness problems that plague the constant mass proposal are mitigated by the increasing mass with radius proposal. We conclude that the universe has been increasing in mass and radius in obedience to the energy conservation law.
Key words: cosmology, big bang, energy conservation, temperature problem, flatness problem
PACS Classification: 98.80.Bp
I. Introduction
Since the formulation of the standard big bang model [1,2], the question of how to proceed with the universe's evolution without seriously violating the energy conservation...
******* hell.
God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps!
Quote:First, this is not an argument (in case you count it as such); and second the missing information has nothing to do with any theology - it comes from math calculations and logical inferences in physics (that are not mine),God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps! God of the gaps!
and third I don't claim that the missing information in the Universe is a deed of God, and hence 'God of the Gaps'. It is your idee fixe - it has nothing to do with me ...
and the 45% do not come from the missing information - they come from the available information about the existence of our Intelligence and the Intelligence (to some degree) of the whole biosphere of the Earth ... that BTW has no function of any stochastic distribution within the near space, as the stochastics of your 'theory' would suppose.
