Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

@FBM,

No, the "x" axis is solar longitude with reference to the Martian northern hemisphere, and is used to show the seasonal variation.

0 Replies

@Setanta,

After scrolling up and down about 15 times, I think I'm up to speed. Gracias.

1 Reply

@FBM,

Wait. When did I lose farmerman and pick up Set? I was so focused on the map that I didn't even notice who was talking to me... Confused

0 Replies

No problem, Boss. Using Ls--solar longitudinal relationsship--makes much more sense because the days and the years of individual planets and satellites vary. A day on earth is 23 hours and 56 minutes, plus about 4 seconds. A year on earth is 365 and a quarter days. A day on Mars is 24 hours, 37 minutes and 22 seconds, and a Martian year is 668 days (more or less, we needn't quibble). So it makes more sense to measure seasons by the Ls relationship rather than getting caught up in an attempt justify mathematically the terrestrial to the Martian days and years.

1 Reply

@Setanta,

Ahh so this is a compound scan of the entire seasonal extent. Still doesn't explain the colors. I think the blue is an extent of water vapor

0 Replies

Yeah, that's a poser. I wasn't attempting to explain the color chart, because i don't have a clue.

0 Replies

Yeah, I take back what I said about the red. Could be, but without a proper legend, who the **** knows? ******* commies. Get with the program already. Ass-plain yer ****.

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/comp26.gif

0 Replies

These "new arguments" (special creationism, etc) against science aren't so new, after all:

0 Replies

@Herald,

http://physicsforidiots.com/

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

You are making the argument that something there is no evidence of may actually exist. I agree that is possible. However when it comes to other possible things such as pink elephants or rainbow unicorns flying out of your butt you suddenly find the argument boring and petty. Are you arguing that we should only accept the things you want to claim are possible and ignore all the others? It seems it's you that is being boring and petty Frank. You have simply declared an ipse dixit and then declared that anyone that doesn't believe exactly as you do is not logical.

Occam's razor says we should pick the simplest solution that the evidence supports. You want to argue that we should pick something there is no evidence for. Without evidence something may be possible but it isn't likely. Are you seriously going to argue that it isn't possible that pink elephants are flying out of your butt? That is not a logical argument based on your position Frank. You are denying your own logic.

1 Reply

@Herald,

The Big Bang has nothing to do with evolution.

1 Reply

@parados,

parados wrote:

You are making the argument that something there is no evidence of may actually exist. I agree that is possible. However when it comes to other possible things such as pink elephants or rainbow unicorns flying out of your butt you suddenly find the argument boring and petty.

I said I find YOU petty and boring, parados. Pink elephants and rainbow unicorns supposedly flying out of my butt...I find very interesting...although bizarre.

You are, in my opinion, very boring and petty.

Quote:

Are you arguing that we should only accept the things you want to claim are possible and ignore all the others? It seems it's you that is being boring and petty Frank. You have simply declared an ipse dixit and then declared that anyone that doesn't believe exactly as you do is not logical.

I am not arguing that at all, parados. Where do you come up with this stuff?

If you want to investigate my butt to see what is coming out of it...I will allow it. I am sure we can work out a way for you to get a worm's eye view of stuff coming out of my butt...and you can determine if there are any elephants or unicorns in it.

Quote:

Occam's razor says we should pick the simplest solution that the evidence supports.

Occam's razor is nonsense.

Quote:

You want to argue that we should pick something there is no evidence for.

Where did I say that. I suggest I have NEVER said that.

You paraphrase so that you do not have to argue against what I actually say...and instead get to argue against the silliness that you invent.

That is especially petty...and boring.

Quote:

Without evidence something may be possible but it isn't likely.

The existence of a GOD...is no more likely or unlikely than "there is no GOD."

We simply do not know. Try to let that penetrate.

Quote:

Are you seriously going to argue that it isn't possible that pink elephants are flying out of your butt? That is not a logical argument based on your position Frank. You are denying your own logic.

Once again, I will allow you to place yourself where you can get a great view of what is coming out of my butt...and you can determine if any elephants or unicorns are coming out, parados.

I do not see what is illogical about that.

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

The Big Bang has nothing to do with evolution.

LOL, NOTHING has!

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Good for you Frank. Now in return, why don't you also arrange for me to see this designer. Then we can compare evidence of both.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
The Big Bang has nothing to do with evolution.

LOL, NOTHING has!

Obviously your post has nothing to do with my being on your ignore list. Drunk

1 Reply

@parados,

parados wrote:

Good for you Frank. Now in return, why don't you also arrange for me to see this designer. Then we can compare evidence of both.

I cannot do that.

Do you read that to mean that it cannot exist...or that because I cannot show it to you, it is improbable that it exists?

You do see how illogical either of those things would be, right?

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

Obviously your post has nothing to do with my being on your ignore list.

I tried once (now) but now I have put you back.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

I think you confuse improbable and impossible. If you can't show me any evidence then it is improbable that it exists however it doesn't make it impossible. Because we have no evidence of rainbow unicorns flying out of your butt makes it improbable that is happening. It doesn't make it impossible.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Your counting is specious as well. You have put me on ignore at least 4 times now.

0 Replies

@parados,

parados wrote:

I think you confuse improbable and impossible.

I most assuredly am not confusing them.

Quote:

If you can't show me any evidence then it is improbable that it exists however it doesn't make it impossible.

I cannot show you atoms, quarks, life from any other planet in our solar system, or beings from any other planet in our galaxy. Are you actually saying therefore...those things are improbable????

Quote:

Because we have no evidence of rainbow unicorns flying out of your butt makes it improbable that is happening. It doesn't make it impossible.

I do have a nice ass, but you have got to get over your obsession with it. But as I said, if you want to watch what comes out of it, I will accommodate you.

0 Replies

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know