@farmerman,
farmerman wrote: Plausible-yep
This is not a valid proof of plausibility.
In order to proof this
...-yep you have to show:
- What is the material carrier of the encoding in the DNA sequence?
- To show from where, when and how each bit of hereditary information is encoded into the DNA sequence ... and for what period of time? ... and is this time one and the same for all species?
- Has the DNA sequence been the carrier of the bio-code for the whole period of existence of life on Earth - 3.8 billion years or so?
- Why do the Crocodile order exhibit no signs of any evolution ... into any birds ... for a period of 228 million years? Do you want another example of species that have bypassed the evolution theory ... and have not evolved into anything for a period of 1 billion years?
- How many billion years will you need to execute any evolutionary metamorphosis of the species ... or to notice in the end that there is something wrong with that theory?
- You have to proof that the information needed for the development of life can be self-encoded spontaneously into a DNA sequence.
- You have to proof that non-living matter can design living matter and breathe life into it ... stochasticaly?
- You have to prove that if the bio-processes are happening at random, there is some probability function of distribution (how you are going to represent probability of 10 to the power of minus 84 is not my problem)
- You have to proof that the Green Algae and the Cyanobacteria (or their equivalents) may appear on any planet throughout the Universe.
Not to mention that you are missing 9.18 billion years in the development of this region of the Universe (where the SS is right now). This is a huge information gap, FM (if the ages are true).
How can anybody make any theory, whatsoever, on the grounds of an assumption of information gap of 9.18 billion years? This is as if to watch the last 45 min of a 2 hour movie, and when you go out to start narrating to the population the whole movie from the very beginning.
farmerman wrote: Evidenced -Yep
- Your evidences are so shaking that they can be used as a proof of any theory, like ID for example.
- The fossils might be showing the design process of the development of the thinking of the ID-er in creating the life on the Earth.
- On the other side it might be showing the gradual acquisition of access of the ID-er to execute life on Earth.
- The sequence of living species on the Earth might have had as an objective to model the conditions on the Earth - for our arrival, for example.
farmerman wrote: Testable-yep
... and what are your test setting and test samples and test vectors ... if it is not some secret.
farmerman wrote: Your point about it being "feasible" is idiotic
It may be idiotic, but you cannot design a brand new species in the lab by following the explanations of the evolution theory, hence you have no verifiable evidence that the evolution even exists in the real world let alone it is doing what it claims to be doing.