Is Jesus God?

Quote:

"All in the graves shall come out, to resurrection or damnation" (John 5:28/29)

All those that believe in a fiery hell of torment should consider this verse above where Jesus said "All in the graves....." all dead are in their grave, not a fiery hell of suffering and torment. Hel means to cover over such as helmet.

All dead ones are in the graves.
Also, no family, friends, priest, ministers, or church members have ever at a funeral declared that the deceased went to or is going to hell.

Romeo, I wasn't disagreeing with you, just pointing out what is obvious in the verse you posted.

Neologist said: All bible translations "mess" with the comma, since it does not appear in the original Greek text. Where it is placed becomes a matter of belief. If you believe Jesus ascended to heaven on the same day he was executed, let me know how that could be true.

So where exactly is this 'Paradise'?

Romeo asked: So where exactly is this 'Paradise'?
Neologist replied: I suppose you forgot to check this but the Hebrew words we know as 'garden of eden' transliterate as 'paradise of pleasure'
So I guess Jesus was speaking of a place where your feet could touch dirt.

But you would do well to start calling your blind gusses...blind guesses.

WORSHIP THE ONLY AND ONLY GOD: JESUS!

Ok, it is spelled Foxhole. Just a typo.

Quote:

But you would do well to start calling your blind gusses...blind guesses.

Gusses???

Hey all! we are just giving blind gusses.

Your are becoming very repetitious. We've heard it all numerous times all ready.

Neologist said to me: There are 2 groups. You keep forgetting those mentioned in John 10:16.

Frank Apisa said: But you would do well to start calling your blind gusses...blind guesses.
Enaj replied: Your are becoming very repetitious. We've heard it all numerous times

. . . .but what's that got to do with this thread?

Poor Frankie, he's been stuck in that sand trap for ages swinging blindly to try to get out

Neologist said to me: It serves merely to underscore your failure to realize God's purpose to fill the earth as he told Adam and Eve.

We KNOW that already mate because Isaiah said it long before you did..
"God formed the Earth to be inhabited" (Isaiah 45:18 )

Romeo Fabulini wrote:

Poor Frankie, he's been stuck in that sand trap for ages swinging blindly to try to get out

Now look at what people you are. Instead of providing him with some synonyms for 'blind guess' to enrich his misunderstanding of the world, you are commenting the number of blank pages ... unfortunately not only in his 'bible'.
The synonyms: double blind guess; triple blind guess; vision amnesia; blind claim as an ultrasound, etc.

God's covenants are not broken. He will be true an faithful to Israel until the end.

There are 7 years of Jacob's trouble coming upon this earth--after those 7 years Jesus will return with 10,000s of His saints to set up His earthly Kingdom on this Earth. He will set it up in Jerusalem and the Jews will be in charge of the hosting of all nations when they come annually to WORSHIP THE ONLY AND ONLY GOD: JESUS! The Church is Jesus's bride Israel is His chosen people. The Book of Revelation clearly states that Jesus will return and put His foot on the Mount of Olives and it will split asunder--then He will destroy all of Israel's enemies that have wages war with them. It is there--just read it!

Romeo quoted: "God formed the Earth to be inhabited" (Isaiah 45:18 )
Neologist replied: Then why do you insist the only hope for mankind is heaven?

No "misunderstanding" on my part, Herald.

You assert there is a GOD.

Sounds to me like a blind guess.

If it isn't...show me how you KNOW something like that.

Frank Apisa wrote:

No "misunderstanding" on my part, Herald.

So, if you think that when you write something in boldface it is vaccinated against misunderstanding of the world, think again.

Frank Apisa wrote:

You assert there is a GOD.

I haven't said exactly this ... but as you say so (to use 'the jelous belief-in-God argument' against non-atheists) ... when arguments fail you.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Sounds to me like a blind guess.

Why don't you stop torturing us with your 'blind guess' and make some interpretation of it.
The guess has no vision, so in the literal sense it is always blind.
By definition 'to guess' means: to make a statement or prediction without sufficient information or knowledge, usually with missing causality.
If you miss the causality by definition, the guess should be 'blind' by definition as well. Using tautology 'blind blind process' makes no sense ... let alone some kind of argumentation.
How can you prove that your assessment is not 'blind assessment'?

Frank Apisa wrote:

If it isn't...show me how you KNOW something like that.

I will answer to this when you stop writing in boldface and capitals (trying to assign by such 'fireworks' some extra logic to statements with shaking semantics ... and faded out argumentation).