@Setanta,
Quote:"No, it doesn't change the impact of the story on people. It does not in any way authorize your silly references to an invisible spirit. You have attempted throughout to suggest that there was something there, other than the delusions which people cherish, but you've supplied no evidence for your claim of an invisible spirit."
Now that we have established that there has been considerable impact on individual lives thousands of years after the fact (or story if you prefer) I again have to point out the implausibility of just a story causing it. Without some interaction with that invisible spirit the story and its influence would have faded away after a few generations at best, especially with the enlightenment offered by modern science.
At this point I should add that the effects are not limited to just those linked to the 'Jesus story'. The entire population of earth is affected by the presence of that invisible spirit in one way or another. How you react to it can be affected by the culture you grow up in, family traditions, religious influences, etc. but most of all, by your personal reaction to that influence.
The problem is, you may attribute or attach that influence to a religion, a cult, the drugs you were taking, the one you fell in love with, the UFO you may have seen, etc. but the point is that all those other things could be quickly dismissed if it were not for that sensed spirit. Another possible outcome is, when the thing you attached that spiritual influence to fails you, you may toss both of them out.
An even worse outcome is that you tie the real influence of that invisible spirit to something unworthy of it and hang onto it. That is the origin of things like ISIS, Boco harem, doomsday cults, UFO and New Age cults and many modern religions. That's the only way I can logically explain why many totally whack belief systems survive. Even though people cannot give voice to what it is or present hard evidence of it, they sense the undeniable presence of that spirit and make a bad choice of what to attribute it to.
The other alternative is to assume that large numbers of people are inherently prone to self destructive myths and delusion. That of course is what Dawkins, others and perhaps you believe but that is not very compatible with evolution. Hard to see how such tendencies would have survival advantages instead of disadvantages.