Is this introduction good ?

The discussion "Moving Out" is getting more interesting. Many, including students between 17 and 22, leave home to live on their own, supposedly to get more chances in life. But is that right?

The longer I contemplate "Moving Out" the more intriguing does it become. It states that many such, presumably to improve their prospects, leave home to live on their own, especially students between 17 and 22. But is this observation correct?

"Moving Out" piques our interest by the assertion that many (especially a student 17 to 22) moves out to live on his own hoping to enhance his outlook. But would you agree?

I wonder if you'd agree that certain implications of "Moving Out" deserve more interest than we've shown. Isn't it interesting for instance that many, including students between 17 and 22, leave home to live on their own wholly motivated by the notion that doing so improves their future opportunities.

The discussion entitled "Moving Out" appearing Feb. 22 issue is proving more interesting with each subsequent issue of "Letters to the Editor." In particular many of your readers have concluded that its author includes students between 17 and 22 who left home to live on their own. But in this particular case, can your assertion that most mistakenly do so with the apparent motive to "get more chances in life" be right?