@edgarblythe,
I'm not the one ganging up on one poster, ed. You guys are.
The truth is that there is a scientific consensus on this issue, and that this consensus is doubted and attacked by people with a very strong ideological bias. That qualifies as "denialism".
It's easy to prove me wrong, ed. You could simply acknowledge that there is evidence pointing to a historical Jesus, evidence which you chose not to trust but that does exist. Instead you've been saying "no evidence no evidence no evidence" forever like a robot toy, thus behaving as the caricature of a denialist...