@gungasnake,
Quote:
The claim that there is such a thing as "quote mining(TM)" is basically bullshit. In real life, if you don't want to be quoted as having said something, there is a terrifyingly easy way to accomplish that, i.e. don't say it.
So thats your entire defense of the practise eh? When a single sentence like ;
"Years ago we found that there was little evidence to support transitional changes in the fossil record".. However, today, with all the finds in paleontology , weve been able to "fill in" mnay of the gaps in transitional fossils predicted by Darwin (I had to go back and check thie one out from a paper by Dave Raup)
This was quote mined to say
"We found that there was little evidence to support transitional changes in the fossil record"
I think that this is a disingenuous, fraudulent practise to tryt to get bullshit quote mining into print specifically on the internet where there is no control over things like truth and accuracy.
You state that you dont know anything about Conservipedia yet you seem to post crap thats almost verbatem from thei crap. So you think up your own crap? Im just curious where you pull up your stuff.