@Frank Apisa,
Frank,
When I went to college I realized that there were subjects that I could respect and subjects that I had less respect for. The criteria that I used was what are the consequences for being wrong.
The subjects that I respected were the pure sciences, math, business administration, architecture, and engineering.
I had less respect for archeology, history, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.
The goofball subjects included religious studies. There was only one professor who knew what he was talking about. Most of them were extremely egotistical. If they were even mildly challenged they had no answer except "this is my class and you will listen to me". There was no accountability for anything they said.
Even back then it was assumed that God did not exist. It was assumed that mankind was the "sovereign of the world". It was with this extreme bias that religion was "examined"
The "Jesus Project" was extremely biased. I put no credence in it
A person can be a devoted Catholic and know very little about God. Liturgy can be quite meaningful if the person knows what is going on. However, many Catholics have no idea what is going on in most of the service. And, who knows what is going on if the service is in Latin.
God made sure that the first "sermon" was understood by each person that was present. That was pretty smart of God. 😁
Since 99 percent of us don't have the scientific knowledge to make a decision about Evolution, we can't conclusively prove to someone else the existence of God. However, God will reveal Himself to you if you let Him.