@maxdancona,
I don't recall Wilso's position as a statement about "Universal Truth" which is of course the language of theism. Wilso's position is different because atheism is
not about a specific belief . It is about the irrationality of theism and its function with respect to reifying pernicious tribalism and devaluing "this life". A potential counter argument... that despotic intolerant atheists (like Stalin) weakens that position... is
invalid because a charismatic figure (for whom one might die) has merely replaced a celestial mythical one as a tribal authority.
The problem with the "tolerance" lobby is that they give intellectual succour to... and have no jurisdiction over ....present day fanatics with possible access to weapons of mass destruction with which they might seek to hasten "the next life". It is on this point that atheism is rationally incomparable. But what matters here is not the rationality (which to atheists is self-evident) but the tactics of dealing psychological addiction and its social consequences. On that point, as I have already stated, confrontation is unlikely to yield results.