1
   

Help! Craven needs new words for his lengthy debates.

Forums: Philosophy
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
cavfancier
 
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:07 pm
I admire Craven's skill at debating. However, it has come to my attention that he uses 'fallacy' and all it's brethren, i.e. 'fallacious', etc., and 'ad hominem' just far too much. It's not that he is incorrect in his use of these terms, but a few more words might just add a touch of pizazz to his arguments. I wouldn't suggest using existing words. I think the A2K community should band together and invent some new debate words that our fearless leader could use. My first suggestion might be 'filiblustery', which could mean when ad hominem arguments catch wind and get bloated. Smile I know you folks can suggest more.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,918 • Replies: 69
No top replies

 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:08 pm
Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:08 pm
Aww, come on, play along...
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:12 pm
Fine, I'll weigh in on what I think the participants need as they arrive.
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:17 pm
bogus is good...um.mmmmm and to think i love word games...hmmmmmmm....speaking plainly is good too...like LIAR..or Nincompoop...or astucious and knavish for the other intellectuals..:-)
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:35 pm
I have always been partial to scoundrel, scalawag, blackguard and knave! Laughing
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:37 pm
Anyone who uses eleemosynary correctly neither needs our help, nor is likely to profit from it.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:40 pm
Cav, in your opening piece you have written it's when you should have written its.

I have used "fatuous" recently, which made me feel a lot better.

Or how about "specious"? I'll go and look that one up.

McT
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 02:52 pm
Quote:
Anyone who uses eleemosynary correctly neither needs our help, nor is likely to profit from it.



Yeah, but it's great for the rest of us who don't tawk so good! Laughing
0 Replies
 
kirsten
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 03:13 pm
Thought you didn't want real words?
I submit CONVOLEXICON, a phrase with twisted roots, i.e a mixed metaphor, or non sequitur.
0 Replies
 
kirsten
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 03:54 pm
Lavicious - corrupting with extravagant gifts.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:09 pm
Yes indeedy kirsten, we should stick to non-real words which should explain my use of 'it's' to McTag, or perhaps not. Smile
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:13 pm
I think Craven could make use of the word:

Because.

For example,

I disagree because....

I think you are in correct because....

I feel this way about you/your arguments because....
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:20 pm
"Bloviate."

Main Entry: blo·vi·ate
Pronunciation: 'blO-vE-"At
Function: intransitive verb
Inflected Form(s): -at·ed; -at·ing
: to speak or write verbosely and windily
- blo·vi·a·tion /"blO-vE-'A-sh&n/ noun

A simply wonderful word; to me it evokes an image of a puffer fish about to explode from indignation.

For example:

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:WlA5FyN5yMQJ:www.worldoceans.com/pix/c_spa07.jpg
(Craven mildly peeved)

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:qIb_8QcKUA4J:www.chirpingbird.com/netpets/html/images/trporcup.jpg
(Craven on the verge of a massive bloviation)

( :wink: Just jokin', Crave...)
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:22 pm
Portal Star wrote:
I think Craven could make use of the word:

Because.

For example,

I disagree because....

I think you are in correct because....

I feel this way about you/your arguments because....


History:

Portal makes a false claim with no substantiation.

I call BS on it.

Now Portal wants me to prove a negative.

Portal, you need the "because". You made a claim you need to substantiate it. This is called burden of proof.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:25 pm
'Because' is also a real word, and this loving tribute to Craven should only include made-up words. However, 'in correct' bears some interest...what does it mean when one is 'in correct'? Are they right or wrong?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:34 pm
Wouldn't that be "corrinect"?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:36 pm
We're off to see the wizard, the wonderful Craven De Kere.
Because because because because because, because of the wonderful things he does.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:50 pm
Bloviate. Gotta remember that one. Always good to come across a word that applies as brilliantly to oneself as to one's most prolific opponents.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2004 05:07 pm
nimh wrote:
Bloviate. Gotta remember that one. Always good to come across a word that applies as brilliantly to oneself as to one's most prolific opponents.


I have been known to swell up just prior to posting in Politics myself... :wink:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
The Void and the Absolute Oneness of the Universe - Discussion by Relinquish
can we reconcile darkness in man with madness(lunacy) ? - Question by studentnorway
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
In the GRAND scheme of things, what matters? - Question by komr98
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
How can something come from nothing? - Question by ripple
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Help! Craven needs new words for his lengthy debates.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 04:26:25
▲ ▼