You say that "nothing is no thing". Is it meaningful to say also that nothing, in the sense of no thing, is everything? When I die, I like to tell myself, I will cease to be this particular thing that seems to be and return to what I was before I was born: everything. At the same time, of course, I become no-thing, i.e., instead of a particular something I become a general everything--which I really am even now, but being ego-centered "I" am not aware of it.
u r not bein but ur will that is why u mean usin logics relatively and not provin the absolute condition before referin to absolute logics
no thing could b everything free, but then it is that u here which justify conscious freedom and how existence is true since individually
like also suggestin that u can know what u must die to happen is also provin the liar u r
wat exist when u r not there so dead is free from u then u cant have any point about it, in such absolute term that even u stop existin if u reach an abstract link with beyond u, bc the max of ur existence is u what is about else since beyond ur existence, the u die cannot b present with another present
when u say u go there and then else after killed this u r clearly lyin, showin how u r inventin a support to smthg wrong