@Atom Blitzer,
I'll think about that, and not saying it sarcastically. I post without my mind made up.
I'm not very clear on why that non taxation hasn't led to some Rule of Church (or has it?) counts as an argument that church property shouldn't be taxed.
I don't get that in the first place, the non taxation. Obviously I am not up on my separation of church and state arguments.
I'll try to be quiet for a while and see what the rest of us say.