Philosophy of law ????????

The action of driving while intoxicated, in itself, is dangerous because it puts individuals in harms way if the intoxicated driver loses control which is a good possibility. Therefore to prevent harm, there should be a simple rule: No driving while intoxicated.

Krumple did you just defend drunk driving. My friend is dead, because of a drunk driver. The problem is that these laws are not nearly harsh enough. They should result in having your car seized. Then they should cane your feet until you cannot walk. In a Democracy, we will have laws, and generally they are milder than if you are in Russia under Ivan the Terrible. Take your choice. Plane tickets are cheap.

Krumple, again, crumple it up, and start over. Your brand of abnormal psychology is popular at keg parties with D students and they say things like " the cops suck. " You obviously have not taken physics, statistics, statics, or any civil engineering classes, that would remotely possibly enable you to make accurate intelligent assumptions or conclusions on preventing death and injury in automobiles. You missed all the great debates over changing Department of Transportation attitudes and theories to prevent deaths in collisions with solid bridge supports and guard rails, involving drunks and just common idiots. I was an engineering student, I passed statistics, and I have done first aid at accidents with people with the shell of their face hanging off like a poorly attached bloody mask. Go to some Mothers Against Drunk Driving meetings. You are way off the bell curve, out in left field, with a juvenile attitude. Absolutely nobody should be drinking alcohol and operating a boat, car, bike, plane, or ATV. Why do I bother, you already know that EVERY government on Earth agrees with me, and they all alienate you for your unpopular opinion which everyone knows is insane. No government allows drunks to drive.

Read this: All Federal, State, District, Provincial, County, and City governments on the ENTIRE planet Earth already heard abnormal psychology on this topic, and made drunk driving illegal. Do not be mad at the messenger. Be angry at the entire World, and go pound your head against a wall.

laws are out of knowing some principles being the reason of objective constant value, so laws are created to take advantage of that knowledge by making fancies about having some control on objective realities as if u done any or as if u gonna get any constant thing positivity for real

it became such cheap ridicule to keep meaning creating new law after such obvious vulgar disgusting murder of right

the murder of absolute right is the image of truth being noone, so noone can mean being supported by while everyone run to take advantage from being one then pretention as possible missing fact that would stay constant for a long while

when truth is never anyone nor one, then truth value is infinite fact essentially and endlessly objective rights, so existence is about to consider truth value objectively too so individually since only at the individual level truth as free fact can b real constant

one day u and ur gods are gonna b fucked for daring imposing the most disgusting **** on everything rights and ones rights in the name of truth inferiority to take advantage from **** u from daring keeping meaning that truth value is inferior since noone **** u always more