@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote: People who identify as Democrats outnumber self-identified Republicans,
Are you sure? That's news to me. And for what it's worth, I just checked by Googing "self-identified Republicans Democrats". The first (and most recent) hit I got was
this Rasmussen poll from August 1st this year, saying it's 35% Republicans, 34% Democrats.
joefromchicago wrote:It's questionable, however, whether Romney can persuade independents to support his ticket now that it has the leader of the most-reviled element of the most-despised branch of government on its bottom half.
That's where distractions come in. In the current political environment, everybody who reads a newspaper knows what each party stands for, and whether they like it or not. Your typical "Independents" are no longer the open-minded, critical-thinking citizens that the term evokes. More likely they are ignorant, disoriented morons, easily distracted by Ryan's mild manners, his self-depreciating jokes, his youth, and his good looks (for a politician). Don't expect too much from the independents' talent for discerning candidates based on their platform.
Also don't expect Independents to get too much help from scrutinizing media outlets. Sure, you will hear many reports that "Democrats say" Ryan is a charlatan, a crank, and a wingnut. But you won't hear many outlets reporting, correctly, that the anonymous "Democrats"' assessment on this point would be correct. Instead, everyone will play it safe and stick to he-said, she-said stories. All of the above got G.W. Bush elected and re-elected; it may well work again in this election.