Duality Becoming-Time

... and your point is?

Your question was very precise.

My point is to offer an explanation for the occurrence of events.

And you think you have done that?

Must be in a very sibylline way..

Of course. Why not.


That's very funny, but my own intuiton.

Define "event" !

Event is a single occurrence of a process.

To whom does it "occur"..i.e.who is doing the "counting" or specifying the "event window"?

The observer that experiments and verifies facts.

So all "events" are observer dependent ?
i.e. No observer=no events =no "time" ? (...and presumably no "materiality")

The observer that experiments and verifies real and independent facts.

SCHEME OF BECOMING-TIME DUALITY

At first glance - wtf?
At 2nd glance - This is a statement applying homemade symbols in place of more commom ones. You appear to be referring to 'cause & effect'?, yet I have no means of establishing why.

Was there a question?

I suggest you investigate the paradox of having the observer defining "events" and the requirement for events to be "independent". I wish you luck since that one has eluded most recent writers on ontology (theories of existence) !

Mark, what that means?


Becoming is first, if there is no becoming no time.


Not yet.

I'll do that.

It means....What the ****? but is a current abbreviation expressing total upheaval of expected reasoning on behalf of, in this instance, myself....the reader.
Yes, time, duration is prevalent 'conceptually' between caus and effect.

Thanks Mark for your explanation about "WTF?".
It's interesting to learn more English.

BERGSON AND THE B-T DUALITY

Let’s see the following points:

1) The Bergson’s duration is the Sibilia’s becoming.

2) Sibilia and Bergson agree with the concept of time: abstract and mathematical.

3) For Bergson the duration is the real time of the conscience. Here, we disagree because the becoming is objective and generates the illusion of time.

4) Although, we intuit the becoming, this is not exclusive of the conscience.

5) The Bergson’s negation of the time it was not just right. The time must be consider as a convenience.

ORIGIN OF THE B-T DUALITY

Arrived the moment to consider the time as an illusion, the definition of this concept lead us to the becoming. An illusion is the distorted interpretation for a perceived stimulus really. This stimulus is the becoming. So, the becoming plus its perception (illusion) conform the B-T Duality.