1
   

Supporting Israel?

 
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Feb, 2004 01:30 am
Portal Star wrote:
I feel the same way about monks that set themselves on fire.


Not too sure about that.

During the Vietnam war, I somehow doubt that monks writing letters would have had the same impact as monks burning themselves alive as a form of non-violent protest.....as counter-intuitive as it may seem.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Feb, 2004 11:53 am
truth
I agree with Craven de Kere. I've always admired the Jewish people and their culture, but that should not require of me that I also admire their government's policies. I also admire the culture of Beethoven, Haydn, Goethe, Mozart, Shuman, Schubert, etc., but not the policies of Nazi Germany. For that matter I've alwalys said "My country right!". Today, we are in danger of political punishment for disagreeing with our government's policies, consider the Patriot Acts--reincarnations of McCarthyism. Therefore I see no contradiction in Craven's or my appreciation for Isreal--or for America for that matter--and our criticisms of current policies.
0 Replies
 
JoshuaAri
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 05:49 am
Re: Offensive Remark
IronLionZion wrote:
danieleli54 wrote:
I am pro-israel. I would like to know how it is possible for me to be actively involved in supporting Israel???


Well, you should begin by examining why you are pro-Israel, which hopefully will force you to recognize how retarded that position is given the current state of affairs, thus, riding you of your dilemma. I suspect, however, that like most pro-Israeli people, your support of Israel is based on emotion rather than rationality.


This post was very insulting.

It is true that Jews have a strong sentiments for Israel, and we have always felt that way for 3,000 years.

In fact, in our prayer book, we pray three times a day: "And to Jerusalem, your city, may You return in compassion, and may You rest within it, as You have spoken. May You rebuild it soon in our days as an eternal structure, and may You speedily establish the throne of David within it. Blessed are you, Hashem (G-d), the Builder of Jerusalem."

Yes, I would have to say that we harbor feelings for Israel.

But I would also venture a guess that you were pro-American -- but that could also be "based on emotion rather than rationality"?

When you say rationality, do you imply that the position of Pro-Israel is not rational?

Why should we not support a country that has suffered so much since its inception into the modern world as a hope for Jews all over the world?

Why should we not support a country that prides itself as the only democracy in the Middle East?

Why should we not support a country that has done so much for the welfare of humanity (this includes non-Jews)?

Why should we not support a country that has had to struggle to be accepted in the eyes of the world, including the multitudes of the Arab nations that are positioned nearby, and in the halls of the UN, where Israel is still not offered full status as a country?

Why should we not support a country that offers freedom by the often-restricted peoples of the countries by it?

Why should we not support a country that unilaterally disbanded the Gaza Strip to a people that has been waging terror against it?

In short; why should we not support a country that has, is, and will offer the vision of peace in the turbulent world?

Please think about the above next time, and don't offer any unnecessary insults. Thanks.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 05:59 am
Portal Star wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
I think Craven is right on the money. You won't catch me standing in front of any bulldozers though.
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/video/us/2003/03/17/rt.protest.killed.vs.kiro.jpg It occurred to me that my previous post might be misunderstood. I was referring to this tragic event. I admire her intentions, but wouldn't be her.


I don't. She would have been of much more use writing letters and doing small actions than risking her life in a publicity stunt. I feel the same way about monks that set themselves on fire.


How do you feel about the bulldozer driver who deliberately ran her over like a stray dog?
0 Replies
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 09:30 am
Wilso wrote:
Portal Star wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
I think Craven is right on the money. You won't catch me standing in front of any bulldozers though.
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/video/us/2003/03/17/rt.protest.killed.vs.kiro.jpg It occurred to me that my previous post might be misunderstood. I was referring to this tragic event. I admire her intentions, but wouldn't be her.


I don't. She would have been of much more use writing letters and doing small actions than risking her life in a publicity stunt. I feel the same way about monks that set themselves on fire.


How do you feel about the bulldozer driver who deliberately ran her over like a stray dog?

About the same way you feel about King Kana's land that you are squatting on after wiping out his folks.
Which is about as rational as the absurd canard you posted.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 03:23 pm
We can find atrocities performed by both sides. Given the situation in Isreal, it would be strange if such events did not occur there. Frankly, I'd like to give Texas to the Jews. Short of that, we should pressure Isreal to forge policies toward their neighbors that would contribute to Isreal's long-term survival. Its survival should be, as far as I'm concerned, an absolute of American foreign policy, but that does not mean that we support ANY and all actions on the part of Isreal. Don't ask me what the Jews SHOULD do; their problem is beyond my capacity to solve. But I do want them to adopt policies less like those expressed by Bush's suicidal cowboy attitude.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 08:51 pm
JLN wrote:
Don't ask me what the Jews SHOULD do; their problem is beyond my capacity to solve.


What is their problem?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 11:15 pm
Infrablue, you ask what is their problem? Their problem is that they are surrounded by nations and paranational groups that would destroy them if possible, and, as I see it, the day will come when they will be technologically capable of doing so. Isreal cannot just hang in there. Nuclear weapons small enough to be carried into Isreal without detection are an inevitability--if one waits long enough. The motivation to destroy Isreal must somehow be removed, but I don't see how that can happen given the depth of the hatred seen today. By the way, the same applies to New York, Los Angeles and Washington. A scary future, because nations are too pig-headed and self-righteous to make the necessary and truly radical changes in the ways they treat other nations.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 10:31 pm
JLNobody wrote:
Infrablue, you ask what is their problem? Their problem is that they are surrounded by nations and paranational groups that would destroy them if possible, and, as I see it, the day will come when they will be technologically capable of doing so. Isreal cannot just hang in there. Nuclear weapons small enough to be carried into Isreal without detection are an inevitability--if one waits long enough. The motivation to destroy Isreal must somehow be removed, but I don't see how that can happen given the depth of the hatred seen today. By the way, the same applies to New York, Los Angeles and Washington. A scary future, because nations are too pig-headed and self-righteous to make the necessary and truly radical changes in the ways they treat other nations.


How do you remove the motivation to destroy another? How do you remove hatred?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 10:33 pm
Moishe3rd wrote:
Wilso wrote:
Portal Star wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
I think Craven is right on the money. You won't catch me standing in front of any bulldozers though.
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/video/us/2003/03/17/rt.protest.killed.vs.kiro.jpg It occurred to me that my previous post might be misunderstood. I was referring to this tragic event. I admire her intentions, but wouldn't be her.


I don't. She would have been of much more use writing letters and doing small actions than risking her life in a publicity stunt. I feel the same way about monks that set themselves on fire.


How do you feel about the bulldozer driver who deliberately ran her over like a stray dog?

About the same way you feel about King Kana's land that you are squatting on after wiping out his folks.
Which is about as rational as the absurd canard you posted.


This is definately a problem of all people.
0 Replies
 
JoshuaAri
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 10:27 am
Israel --- to Texas?
Probably the only reason the Israelis and Jews all over the world want Israel is because we have a STRONG connection to the land.

It was given to us in the Torah (Bible).

We pray everyday three times a day (or more) that we will return to Israel someday.

We pray (again, three times a day) that the Beis HaMikdash (Holy Temple) will be rebuilt.

We talk about aliyot (moving to Israel).

We conclude holidays with the hope that "We'll See You Next Year In Jerusalem".

We add in the Bircas HaMatzon (Grace After Meals) the hope that we will return to Israel.

Our families are buried in Israel (grandparents, cousins, in addition to Avraham Avinu (Abraham), Yitzchak Avinu (Issac), Yaakov Avinu (Jacob) and their wives); we want to visit them.

In short: we love Israel. And we're not about to give up Israel.

At one World Zionist conference some 50 years ago, somebody suggested that we should use Uganda as a refuge for the barely surviving Holocaust surviviors; they were in dire need of a place to live. But the idea was shot down -- we want Israel, not just because we need land, but because it has so much significance to us, in our religion.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 10:49 am
yes indeed, if mankind destroys itself it will be for two reasons, ideology and greed. The drive to do anything to support religious drives (even suicide bombing) and the destruction of the environment for profits.
0 Replies
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 11:04 am
Re: Israel --- to Texas?
JoshuaAri wrote:
Probably the only reason the Israelis and Jews all over the world want Israel is because we have a STRONG connection to the land.

It was given to us in the Torah (Bible).

We pray everyday three times a day (or more) that we will return to Israel someday.

We pray (again, three times a day) that the Beis HaMikdash (Holy Temple) will be rebuilt.

We talk about aliyot (moving to Israel).

We conclude holidays with the hope that "We'll See You Next Year In Jerusalem".

We add in the Bircas HaMatzon (Grace After Meals) the hope that we will return to Israel.

Our families are buried in Israel (grandparents, cousins, in addition to Avraham Avinu (Abraham), Yitzchak Avinu (Issac), Yaakov Avinu (Jacob) and their wives); we want to visit them.

In short: we love Israel. And we're not about to give up Israel.

At one World Zionist conference some 50 years ago, somebody suggested that we should use Uganda as a refuge for the barely surviving Holocaust surviviors; they were in dire need of a place to live. But the idea was shot down -- we want Israel, not just because we need land, but because it has so much significance to us, in our religion.


JoshuaAri,
I happen to be a Torah observant Jew, as I suspect you are.
However, you have to recognize that the majority of the Jews that live in Eretz Israel are not Torah observant Jews, which therefore makes their claim to Israel very specious on a Torah basis.
So, I believe that the additional point needs to be made that Israel should be supported, and exists based on the same rationale that any nation exists. It has produced a strong, technologically advanced, socially just, economically energized, self-sufficient, democratic, multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious, civilization where none existed before.
This is real and measurable, especially in comparison to all of the other nations in the area, who have had a great deal more natural wealth to produce civilization than Israel ever has or will.
0 Replies
 
JoshuaAri
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 01:09 am
What you said, Moishe, was true -- yet, there are many Torah-Observant Jews in Israel also (in addition to those in New York, Los Angeles, Miami, and the rest of the world) -- the Torah evidence still stands strong.

Israel can be defended in the name of its' contribution to the world in science, math, technology, literature, and G-d-knows-what-else.

But it can also be defended in the name of Torah and of Jewry.



-- May the Golus be ended and the beginnings of the Geula be visible; May the dispersed be gathered once again and flourish in their land; to take up the responsibility of being an "or l'goyim" once again --
0 Replies
 
Raul-7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 02:48 am
Re: Israel --- to Texas?
JoshuaAri wrote:
Probably the only reason the Israelis and Jews all over the world want Israel is because we have a STRONG connection to the land.

It was given to us in the Torah (Bible).

We pray everyday three times a day (or more) that we will return to Israel someday.

We pray (again, three times a day) that the Beis HaMikdash (Holy Temple) will be rebuilt.

We talk about aliyot (moving to Israel).

We conclude holidays with the hope that "We'll See You Next Year In Jerusalem".

We add in the Bircas HaMatzon (Grace After Meals) the hope that we will return to Israel.

Our families are buried in Israel (grandparents, cousins, in addition to Avraham Avinu (Abraham), Yitzchak Avinu (Issac), Yaakov Avinu (Jacob) and their wives); we want to visit them.

In short: we love Israel. And we're not about to give up Israel.

At one World Zionist conference some 50 years ago, somebody suggested that we should use Uganda as a refuge for the barely surviving Holocaust surviviors; they were in dire need of a place to live. But the idea was shot down -- we want Israel, not just because we need land, but because it has so much significance to us, in our religion.


Numerous prohets were from Jerusalem; it doesn't mean it belongs to the Jews alone.

The sacredness of the city of Jerusalem, according to Islam, is in its historical religious reality. This is the city that witnessed the life and works of the greatest Prophets and Messengers of Allah. Here the Divine Grace touched the earth repeatedly. Allah's great Prophets and Messengers lived and moved in its valleys and its streets. Makkah and Madinah are blessed cities in Islam because of their association with the Prophets Abraham, Ishmael and Mohammed. In a similar way Jerusalem is blessed and important in Islam because of its association with other Prophets of Allah, namely David, Solomon and Jesus.

Jews and Christians do not recognize Ishmael and Mohammad as God's Prophets and Messengers, so they do not consider Makkah and Madinah as sacred cities.

However, Muslims believe in Prophets Moses, David, Solomon and Jesus, and so they must recognize the sacredness and importance of Jerusalem in Islam.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 09:36 am
I have no problem with those who would die for their beliefs.

What I find repulsive are those who would kill for their beliefs.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 10:54 am
Moishe3rd
It Is true that the greater percentage of Israeli Jews are not Torah observant. However, IMO one does not need to be Torah observant to have emotional ties with the state of Israel and to Judaism. I should remind you that even secular Jews almost overwhelmingly return to their roots upon death and have traditional religious burials. One may not live as a Jew but most die as one.

Just a thought.
0 Replies
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 11:09 am
au1929 wrote:
Moishe3rd
It Is true that the greater percentage of Israeli Jews are not Torah observant. However, IMO one does not need to be Torah observant to have emotional ties with the state of Israel and to Judaism. I should remind you that even secular Jews almost overwhelmingly return to their roots upon death and have traditional religious burials. One may not live as a Jew but most die as one.

Just a thought.

Absolutely.
I was simply pointing out that Israel should be supported based on the same criteria that one would or would not support any nation - totally separate from religious criteria.
A nation should be supported based on the idea whether it contributes to the world and adds to civilization or whether it detracts from the world and tears down civilization.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 12:42 pm
By that criterion, the United States, with its development and exportation of the most decadent forms of entertainment and "art", would be in trouble.
0 Replies
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 02:47 pm
JLNobody wrote:
By that criterion, the United States, with its development and exportation of the most decadent forms of entertainment and "art", would be in trouble.

If that is your most important criteria for what makes a worthwhile civilization, then you would be correct.
Most ordinary definitions include literacy; cities; public works; a government based on just principles; unifying philosopy or religion; etcetera.
Art is usually considered a by-product of a civilization.
And, you would be correct in that, generally, the art a civilization produces indicates its mental health..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Supporting Israel?
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 06:50:30