2
   

Are lies and misconceptions the basis of Christianity?

 
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 08:50 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Terry- I believe that some people are more outer directed, some more inner directed. There are people who are very concerned about matters that religion encompasses. For many, there is comfort in a structure that spells out answers that some find too difficult or frightening to contemplate on their own. Add that to the tendency for many people to desire validation of by others.


Are we born with a direction?

Yes, we all seek validation. Perhaps that is why we turn to sites such as A2K to find support for ideas that are not socially acceptable in our real lives? Smile
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 09:00 am
rosborne979 wrote:
Terry wrote:
Setanta, why do you suppose that some people adhere to religious dogma while others reject it? Are some minds naturally more receptive/less skeptical, or does childhood training and experience determine your level of belief?


This is an interesting question, and one I've been trying to answer for years. This was the core question I was trying to probe with my "do you believe in Magic" threads (here and on abuzz). In those threads, I was trying to see how many people believe in the supernatural, and why they choose to believe this.

The distinction between belief and skepticism seems to be a choice which people make early in their lives, and I don't know what makes people lean more in one direction than the other.

It's an interesting choice because it's one which must be made with no information. The two philosophies cannot be measured from the outside, yet it's from the outside that we must all start, so what makes us choose what we choose?


I recall seeing a survey on the percentage of people who believe in supernatural phenomena such as ghosts, angels, and aliens and that some of that belief was attributed to watching television. I will try to find it tonight, but meantime, could you post a link to your belief in magic threads? Thanks.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 11:19 am
Terry wrote:
So do we let people cling to their superstitions and dogma, or try to lead them to the truth (as WE know it, of course. :wink: )? Perhaps we could take up a collection each Thursday and and send out missionaries to all parts of the world to teach critical thinking skills ...


Good luck ! ! ! Apart from the fact that many people, such as am i, are tight-fisted, i rather think that you would not have much chance of convincing the dogmatic that they possess critical thinking skills. Like so many things which we wish children would learn, this is something which needs to be absorbed while young, and preferrably in the home. It's a little late to try to change people when they're adults with families of the their own. I do believe that the human race improves over time, but slowly enough that one probably wouldn't notice a difference within one's own lifetime.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 12:58 pm
truth
Setanta, I see a lot of wisdom in your general argument here. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 01:42 pm
Terry wrote:
... but meantime, could you post a link to your belief in magic threads? Thanks.


Here' the link to the one on A2K, it seems to have the more interesting content anyway (compared to abuzz): http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9988
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 06:16 pm
Setanta wrote:
I suppose, and it is only supposition, that people adhere to dogma, whether religious or political, because it relieves them of the need to think for themselves.


your supposition is simply wrong...for example, there are MANY Christian scientists...

Setanta wrote:
People continue to cling to revealed truths, to dogma, because they haven't the habit of thought.


smarter men than you are Christians....the truth is as the bible states:


(2 Corinthians 4:4) “the god of this world (Satan) hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest THE LIGHT OF THE GLORIOUS GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST, who is the image of God, should shine unto them”


(John 3:19) “This is the condemnation (judgment) that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather that light, because their deeds were evil.”


( Isaiah 5:20) “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil, that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.”
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 06:49 pm
Thanks for reminding me of my thoughts on the "magic thread" rosborne.

The oiginal question on this thread assumes "truth" to be axiomatic, yet interestingly the Christian "story" includes Pilate's astute philosophical question "what is truth ?". It was quite a neat stylistic move by Jesus to cut that one dead ! Smile

My answer to this question is to argue that "spirituality" has something to do with an elusive " ultimate truth", but particular religious practices and beliefs do not. On the contrary specific beliefs and practices tend to corrupt "spirituality" and become a an "authoritative power base". The Romans adoption of Christianity and the moving of the sabbath to Sunday is a good illustration of this (which perhaps Bush should study a little).
According to this context the definition of "lies and misconceptions" can only be political and not empirical.
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:49 am
Fresco, interestingly, none of the earlier gospels relate that Jesus said thing to Pilate about truth. According to Mark, Matthew and Luke, Jesus acknowledged that he was called king of the Jews and then remained silent.

John was written at least 60 years after Jesus' death, by unknown authors (possibly Gnostics) who adapted the stories to their own purposes. The dialog between Jesus and Pilate was fabricated. This brings us back to my original question.

Do you think that the lies and misconceptions fostered by the Christian church might have been designed to bring people closer to some "ultimate truth" or were they motivated primarily by politics and the desire for power?
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 07:02 am
Rosborne, re your thread on magic and the supernatural, here are some surveys on belief:

Quote:
R. Kelly Myers of the University of New Hampshire Survey Center says 14 percent believe they've seen a ghost, 7 percent report seeing angels, and 9 percent reported seeing a UFO.
Nearly half of those surveyed are "either unsure or actually believe in astrology," he said. And 46 percent "admit they occasionally read their horoscopes," he says, "while 6 percent say outright they believe in it."
Sept 6, 1996 U of NH survey


Quote:
Sparks says people tended to put paranormal phenomena into two groups. One group includes creatures that Sparks labels as supernatural beings, such as ghosts, space aliens and angels. The other group consists of psychic phenomena, such as ESP, astrology and the ability to move objects with the mind. "If people endorsed one member or aspect of a group, then they tended to accept them all. It was usually all or none," he says.

Sparks says he thinks television's influence may be tied to how realistically it depicts the paranormal. "Because we saw a connection between supernatural beings and television -- and no such connection between psychic powers and television programming -- we think it may have something to do with the fact that television provides more vivid coverage of ghosts and space aliens. Things like ESP may be harder to depict on TV in such a vivid fashion," he says.

Sparks says belief in paranormal phenomena was quite common among the study's respondents. "For example, over 50 percent of them indicated a belief in ghosts; nearly one-third reported that sometimes they had been able to read another person's mind through extrasensory perception; and nearly 45 percent believed in UFOs from outer space," he says.

Those percentages are similar to national poll results. However, as far as Sparks is concerned, why people come to believe in such phenomena is just as important as what they actually believe. Sparks' research shows that the media do exert some influence on paranormal beliefs.

"We are hoping to draw attention to the ways in which people arrive at their beliefs about the nature of the world," Sparks says. He says charges that the media have not exercised enough caution in disseminating information about paranormal events may be justified if it's proven that the media have undue influence in shaping society's beliefs.
October 17, 1997 Sparks survey


Quote:
That very large majorities of the American public, and almost all (but not all) Christians believe in God, the survival of the soul after death, miracles, heaven, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, and the Virgin birth will come as no great surprise. What may be more surprising is that half of all adults believe in ghosts, almost a third believe in astrology, and more than a quarter believe in reincarnation - that they were themselves reincarnated from other people. Majorities of about two-thirds of all adults believe in hell and the devil, but hardly anybody expects that they will go to hell themselves.

The survey also found that women are more likely than men to hold both Christian and non-Christian beliefs. African-Americans are more likely than whites and Hispanics to hold Christian beliefs, as are Republicans. The level of belief is generally highest among people without a college education and lowest among those with postgraduate degrees.
Jan 2003 Harris survey


This review of "From Angels To Aliens: Teenagers, the Media and the Supernatural" by Lynn Schofield Clark has some intersting ideas on belief.

review
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 07:07 am
micah wrote:
Setanta wrote:
I suppose, and it is only supposition, that people adhere to dogma, whether religious or political, because it relieves them of the need to think for themselves.


your supposition is simply wrong...for example, there are MANY Christian scientists...

Setanta wrote:
People continue to cling to revealed truths, to dogma, because they haven't the habit of thought.


smarter men than you are Christians....the truth is as the bible states:


(2 Corinthians 4:4) "the god of this world (Satan) hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest THE LIGHT OF THE GLORIOUS GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST, who is the image of God, should shine unto them"


(John 3:19) "This is the condemnation (judgment) that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather that light, because their deeds were evil."


( Isaiah 5:20) "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil, that put darkness for light, and light for darkness."


Micah, you just reinforced Setanta's point. Laughing You just posted quotes from the Bible rather than thinking up ideas of your own.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 07:11 am
Terry- But it's so much easier that way! Laughing
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 07:57 am
Setanta wrote:
I do believe that the human race improves over time, but slowly enough that one probably wouldn't notice a difference within one's own lifetime.


It seems to me as though the rate of change has accelerated. Homo sapiens existed for 200,000 years without doing much of anything, but in the last 10,000 years or so (since the invention of agriculture) civilizations, political systems and formal religions have proliferated and changed attitudes. If your friends and family express belief in magical beings, it is easier to attribute inexplicable events to them instead of looking for a natural cause.

You would think that our increasing understanding of science would displace superstitions, but an astounding number of people still believe in ghosts. Modern fairy tales simply replace elves and dragons with aliens and bioengineering-gone-wrong mutant monsters. I suspect that television has a tremendous influence on belief by presenting fiction in a way that the non-critical mind is likely to conflate with factual information.

Perhaps people need to believe that the universe is really a magical place, where anything is possible and supernatural beings just might intervene in their humdrum lives.
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 08:06 am
Phoenix, IMO, micah's quote would be more truthful if slightly revised:

"the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe, lest THE LIGHT OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, should shine unto them"

You would think that if there were some Ultimate Truth, it would be clearly perceived by everyone who looked for it. But it has been my experience that the blinders of belief prevent people from seeing anything that conflicts with their religious tenets, even if it is written in black and white in their own Bible.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 08:21 am
Quote:
You would think that if there were some Ultimate Truth, it would be clearly perceived by everyone who looked for it. .


Terry- Maybe so, but IMO, not at this point in our evolution. I think that science is only beginning to scratch the surface of understanding of the natural world.

Quote:
But it has been my experience that the blinders of belief prevent people from seeing anything that conflicts with their religious tenets, even if it is written in black and white in their own Bible.



Many people have a difficult time dealing with uncertainty. IMO, religion wraps everything up in a nice, neat package for people, which allays anxiety. When these tenets are questioned, the comfort provided by blindly accepting the religious doctrines are put into into controversy, which again creates more anxiety. Rather than thinking through the inconsistencies that are presented, the believer will tend to go on the attack, flailing against anything that might cause a chink in his belief system.

Since religion is in no way based on logic and/or reason, the believer's only recourse, in an attempt to shore up his position, is to quote passages
from the very works that are the source ot his comfort.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 12:54 pm
truth
Terry, as you know by now I think we do see "ultimate truth" every second of our lives but do not recognize "it" (because we cover it over with thoughts, models, desires, expectations, etc.).
BTW I did answer your question on the Reality Thread.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Feb, 2004 06:07 am
Terry,

In answer to your question about the "purpose" of "lies and misconceptions"....from my point of view that "reality" as a social construction, the positive or negative connotations placed on different versions of such reality are not normally (consciously) "engineered" but are part of the interplay of social interactions between new and existing social structures. We could equally attach the label "misconceptions" to aspects of many other social concepts such as "patriotism" , "justice", "charity" etc depending on which direction we are coming from. The difference between "religious" and "non-religious concepts" is in their claim to "divine origin" and that makes them particularly problematic.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Feb, 2004 03:35 pm
truth
Fresco, amen!
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Feb, 2004 03:58 pm
Setanta wrote:
The Paine pieces are interesting, as is the excerpt posted by Thomas. However, there is altogether an elitist view of religion which emerges. The ordinary communicant cares little or nothing for the the wrongs or rights of dogma, simply whether or not he or she will have any "stars in their crown." They hold their beliefs unexamined, and prefer that you not examine those beliefs, either. What i am suggesting is, the great majority of the devout do know or care whether or not the dogma to which they adhere makes any logical sense, and will resent any effort to hold what they believe up to a rigorous examination.


Well said.
0 Replies
 
lolli
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2004 01:04 am
WOW!!! I can see that all of the minds that have posted their opinions here are very, um, shall we say, open-minded! Ya'll really. Talking, or shall I say, typing, gets one nowhere as far as debating the origin of Christianity. It's alot of reading 'dead' languages, studying scientific research and (oh no, it's that all dreaded word) faith!! Oh my goodness, I said it. If you're going to stake your opinion of the 'misconceptions and lies' of Christianity on a character such as Thomas Paine (who shall I mention has no religion that worships him and no such credentials in the world of spirituality), you are more open-minded than I thought. Yes! That is verrrry sarcastic, and I am refering to the opening statement posted on the forum. It's enough to piss a gentle soul off, brother!
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2004 01:29 am
Faith is a euphemism for delusion. Further, you'd think that if the Christian God was real, and he wanted me to come into the fold, he would have provided me with something better than a history of wonton murder, lies, and institutionalized ignorance for me to base my decision on.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 11:56:10