@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Quote:I don't view them as "fake meats" as much as meat alternatives.
And youve been giving Frnk Apisa **** for his considered position opn religion that is, as you stated, clearly based on semantic twists>
So now heres you with "meat alternative" as opposed tofake meat".
See how we all can easily convince ourselves of tenuous debate positions?
I think "fake meat" assumes too much. I'd say the term might fit something like a tofu dog, or tofurky products that seem to directly emulate hotdogs and lunchmeat, but something like Seitan is not fake chicken. It's texture causes many to relate it to chicken, but the product itself is not an attempt to recreate chicken. The same would apply to something like tempeh. What is it a fake of?
I don't say, "I'm going to the store to get a fake chicken." I say "I'm going to the store to get some seitan." I don't want fake chicken--I want seitan.
I think the familiar shapes of these products are manufactured for cultural reasons. They comfort. Beyond that, I've found that I like the products that tastes less like meat, and more like their own creation. That's why when I encountered a fully vegan product that had an uncanny real chicken taste and texture, my immediate reaction was alarm, not elation.
I'm not particularly worried my language on this. I hear "fake meat" more from omnivores, than I do from vegetarians or vegans. You can have the term, and you are free to use it to describe my food. Since it's food you'll not be eating, I can't imagine why you care what I call it.
A
R
T