@Leadfoot,
Quote:there will be sound
Fresco might have something to say about that. Berkeley too. What are sound waves without a perceiver to note they are sound waves?
btw, I think the usefulness of these sorts of questions lies in their ability to make us think about what we think we know. The nature of knowledge, the limits, parameters of our thinking in general, logic as one specific.
In other words, does this "conundrum" represent an actual fact, an artifact of logic or even a cultural (read: human) bias? Its difficult to solve..logically anyway. Our intuition tells us different, but then again our intuition is horribly wrong in certain circumstances..Berkeley's argument, while possibly offensive to our sensibilities and intuition, is not so easy to overcome - at least ontologically (pragmatically, we don't care, I don't think its possible to live in accordance with that type of philosophy - but if we were solely pragmatic, philosophy wouldn't exist - or it would be boring!)