@Joe Nation,
Joe Nation wrote:
Joe Nation wrote:
Quote:David:
Zimmerman was in fear of his life while he was STILL in his truck.
He got out of the truck.
David wrote:
Quote:If so, he must have been brave.
No, as you well know, Councillor,
I suspect that u mean Counsellor. "Councillor" means something else.
Joe Nation wrote:the prosecutor will say it shows that he was not, in fact, in fear of his life.
So much for the "I took the action out of fear" defense. poof.
Well, I just took
Joe Nation's word for it. He's never steered me rong b4.
He wrote it
very clearly. I will
not HAVE U, impugning Joe 's veracity! (some nerve!)
Joe Nation wrote:He had no reason to get out of the truck.
Zimmy was motivated to make of himself an obstacle to burglary in the area.
He chose to apply his time to
looking around his naborhood
and to use his natural freedom of speech to make life unpleasant for burglars,
of whom he thawt Mr. T was one. That is perfectly legal.
Joe Nation wrote:He had already called in his report. If his story about Martin circling his truck is true, he would have been easily able to identify Martin to police as the person he suspected as being unlawfully on the property, had he waited for police to arrive.
Well, he was
STILL perfectly able to do that when thay arrived.
Chances r that he probably
DID that,
pointing downward, when thay got there.
Joe Nation wrote:There was no urgency, he hadn't reported that he had witnessed Martin doing anything more than walking around looking at the buildings. That could be "casing the joint" or it could be, since in every complex I've ever been to, all the buildings look alike, an attempt to find his father's apartment.
OK. What is your point ??
Joe Nation wrote:David, you have an odd method of discerning who is defending what.
Good and evil?? pphhpptt.
Yeah, the evil one
was the one that was busy pounding Zimmy 's brain against the sidewalk, without permission.
Joe Nation wrote:Where is your defense of Martin's right to be where he was that night
and his right to walk to his father's house without being accosted.
No one has that right.
Its part of living in a free country.
There is a chance that someone might speak to u. It coud
happen.
Joe Nation wrote:You have that right, what about the rest of us?
I have held a variety of positions, public n private, in my life,
but I
never had
IMMUNITY from being spoken to.
Of course, I coud brush people off, if I wanted to
(but
not to pound their respective brains against the street).
Joe Nation wrote:Are we all to be subjected to the Zimmerman's of the world and their suspicions?
Yes.
Joe Nation wrote:You have this one backwards, yes, this was a contest of power between an innocent passerby
and an armed predator (or if not, predator, a self-appointed judge and jury) and the innocent victim now lies dead.
His crime began when he started pounding Zimmy 's brain againt the cement.
I think that is against the law in Florida (tho I am not admitted to practice there).
Joe Nation wrote:We are all going to learn much more about this case before it's over,
if I am wrong about where I presently stand, I will be the first to admit it and say so here on these pages.
I hope you and (if he ever sees this) BillRM will pledge to do the same.
OK
Joe Nation wrote:Joe(when I say "Liberty and Justice for All, I mean it.)Nation
Zimmy vindicated
HIS right to justice
and to liberty from having his head pounded, when he shot Mr. T.
David
