@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:Repeating it ad nauseum is an implicit insistence that we accept your point of view.
What induces your nausea is seeing
authoritarian-collectivism (i.e., "liberalism") being defeated in argument.
The cure is your
abandonment of liberalism. Try it !
DrewDad wrote:The fact is, that there is no evidence that Zimmerman's life was in danger
Assuming that to be true, for the moment,
he had
no duty to put up with having his brain slammed on the street, instead of shooting the bad guy.
That 's what guns r for, which is the essence of what the USSC said in the
HELLER case.
DrewDad wrote:at the time of the shooting, other than his own testimony.
His testimony is OK; that 's good evidence.
DrewDad wrote:The fact is, that there is evidence that Trayvon was calling for help at the time of the shooting.
That appears
not to be the case (note the black dog-walker to the contrary),
but it is also
irrelevant. [If u found out that John Wilkes Booth were calling for help
while inside Lincoln 's booth, wud that
exculpate him ??????]
What is relevant is Zimmy 's effort to get Mr. T off his chest
and to
end the further slamming of his brain, as aforesaid.
DrewDad wrote:Personally, I doubt that someone intent on murder is going to be calling repeatedly for help.
U deny Zimmy 's 911 call for police??
DrewDad wrote:Please stop badgering us with your opinion.
At the very least, admit that is, in fact, only your opinion.
Y not see if u can get the Terms of Service amended
so that
AUTHORITARIAN-COLLECTIVISTS
must get the last word over freedom-lovers,
either that, or just use the Ignore button ??
